MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
Presumably that's why it has been suggested that he would make it move faster - already being somewhat aware of the case.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)
- Thread starter jimharri
- Start date
Presumably that's why it has been suggested that he would make it move faster - already being somewhat aware of the case.
MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
Neither nominate, their arbitrators do. What that paragraph is saying is that the president is not decided upon until both parties have said who their own arbitrators are.
We suggested a potential president when we informed CAS who our arbitrator was, Uefa agreed with it when they informed who their arbitrator was. The president of the division would then get the agreement of the two arbitrators and then the president of the panel is appointed.
That’s all standard practice. If the arbitrators hadn’t agreed to the president proposed then the president of the division would choose it instead.
Ah, thanks.
I did think it was odd, and not what had been thought beforehand.
What sort of audience do the WhatsApp group actually have in total? Can't see it being huge, or should I say significant enough to damage the club especially globally.
We'll keep on moving forward while they keep biting on those lemons, suck it up hacks as this train will continue motoring forward (legally)
We'll keep on moving forward while they keep biting on those lemons, suck it up hacks as this train will continue motoring forward (legally)
To be honest, I am fed up with this now. City have achieved their objective, we the fans have made our points, and the haters in the media will continue to vent their spleen. Time for us to move on: we have a CL campaign to finish, a transfer window to negotiate, and, very soon, a new season to enjoy. Football!
City for the title!
City for the title!
Although the entirety of the Etisalat sponsorship deal was also time barred and we have no real info in respect of it. I am Sure if necessary we could have proved our innocence but the fact we didn’t is another element the complete bastards in the press are using as a stick to beat us. Especially Mr Conn. If he’s not careful I will set my Uncle Ray on him and if he’s reading this he will know exactly who that is. It’s from an article he wrote about Manchester Maccabi when he was actually a decent journalist.The time barred stuff was simply 2 of the earlier years of the Etihad sponsorship and they found no evidence of any wrongdoing regarding funding in the years that weren't time-barred.
Therefore it's a pretty safe bet that there was nothing in those earlier years that might have incriminated us.
Another hatchet job on City by Conn.
Mansour's payments and a U-turn by Uefa: key Manchester City findings
Court of arbitration for sport judgment also finds no Uefa bias and shows why an alleged FFP breach was unsubstantiated
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...-city-findings-court-of-arbitration-for-sport
Mansour's payments and a U-turn by Uefa: key Manchester City findings
Court of arbitration for sport judgment also finds no Uefa bias and shows why an alleged FFP breach was unsubstantiated
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...-city-findings-court-of-arbitration-for-sport
PannickAtTheDisco
Well-Known Member
Although the entirety of the Etisalat sponsorship deal was also time barred and we have no real info in respect of it. I am Sure if necessary we could have proved our innocence but the fact we didn’t is another element the complete bastards in the press are using as a stick to beat us. Especially Mr Conn. If he’s not careful I will set my Uncle Ray on him and if he’s reading this he will know exactly who that is. It’s from an article he wrote about Manchester Maccabi when he was actually a decent journalist.
Seemed to me there was sufficient justification within the CAS report to clear of us the Etisalat charges regardless.
daztrueblue91
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 4 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 4,081
Another hatchet job on City by Conn.
Mansour's payments and a U-turn by Uefa: key Manchester City findings
Court of arbitration for sport judgment also finds no Uefa bias and shows why an alleged FFP breach was unsubstantiated
https://www.theguardian.com/footbal...-city-findings-court-of-arbitration-for-sport
I like the way Conn is quick to report that there was no evidence of UEFA bias yet I haven’t seen him mention that there were no evidence of UEFAs main charges against us.
I don’t recall any such evidence. There was no transactional evidence re Etisalat and Simon Pearce was specifically only asked about Etihad dealings.Seemed to me there was sufficient justification within the CAS report to clear of us the Etisalat charges regardless.
bluwes
Well-Known Member
Presumably that's why it has been suggested that he would make it move faster - already being somewhat aware of the case.
CAS1 said the leaks from UEFA were worrisome. No wonder we were happy t have him chair CAS2....just checked and it wasn't