Cavani & Falcao

[mgreenz97]

Not sure paying 50 millions for any player beside Messi and Ronaldo is good thing to do.

Well when we can actually get Messi or Ronaldo for 50m then I'll agree with you.

 

[MSP]

Not sure paying 50 millions for any player beside Messi and Ronaldo is good thing to do.

Well when we can actually get Messi or Ronaldo for 50m then I'll agree with you.

We won't but it doesn't mean we should pay 50m for someone else if he's not worth it. And I personally don't find anyone else worth of such money with Neymar being closest to that but not purely on his football quality but marketing value.

50m is bizarre amount of money, specially when you add huge wages that would be required and the fact that player had barely any esale value in that age. When you pay it once for player that is not worth that much you're going to be asked more bizarre amounts for other players you'd be interested to buy in the future. City already have problems with it and it would get only worse. That means more and more real transfer target failures as clubs and agents would have a day whenever City would show an interest and City would refuse to pay it like we saw last summer.

I'm not sure he'd cost that much tbh. it's media who are pumping the price of Falcao and Cavani, but if they would I'd walk away. There could be some exceptions to go over the all odds but that should be only for stupidly good young players.

 

[mgreenz97]

Not sure paying 50 millions for any player beside Messi and Ronaldo is good thing to do.

Well when we can actually get Messi or Ronaldo for 50m then I'll agree with you.

We won't but it doesn't mean we should pay 50m for someone else if he's not worth it. And I personally don't find anyone else worth of such money with Neymar being closest to that but not purely on his football quality but marketing value.

50m is bizarre amount of money, specially when you add huge wages that would be required and the fact that player had barely any esale value in that age. When you pay it once for player that is not worth that much you're going to be asked more bizarre amounts for other players you'd be interested to buy in the future. City already have problems with it and it would get only worse. That means more and more real transfer target failures as clubs and agents would have a day whenever City would show an interest and City would refuse to pay it like we saw last summer.

I'm not sure he'd cost that much tbh. it's media who are pumping the price of Falcao and Cavani, but if they would I'd walk away. There could be some exceptions to go over the all odds but that should be only for stupidly good young players.

Neymar is worth more than Falcao?
I'm gonna go now.

 

[MSP]

Please no, I'm gonna cry if you do :)

First of all, I did not say Neymar is better, only that he is closest to 50m value mark due to his marketability. But I might say it later in this post so stay connected :)

If you can't understand that some people are not FM kiddies and don't think that buy this one for 50, that one for 40 and add 10 more as gift is way things should be done and you don't read what is written it's your problem.

And now to the main stuff - I'd rather buy Neymar than Falcao for any price. If he is not already better he definitely has potential to be that soon. And at his age he can easily be sold and most of his transfer fee earned back unless he is complete failure + all money that is earned from his enormous marketability. With Falcao paid 50m you have 20m worth player in 2 years as he'll be 29.5 years old at that time. Falcao was used by River, Porto and Atletico in his most productive years, and in period they all could bank on him. Atletico will laugh all the way to the bank if someone pay 50 millions for him. Specially if they continue to show form of buying great strikers like they did recently and have some good replacement lined.

And on top of all that, there's absolutely no reason why Falcao should be paid 12 millions more than Aguero. He might be more clinical but Kun is easily better overall player and on top of that 2.5 years younger. Resale value, another contract and all that if you can follow me...

But let's spend 50 millions on someone, the next year is all that is important.

 

[enzoedinson]

<a class="postlink" href="http://espnfc.com/news/story/_/id/1386427/cavani-ucl-action-key-suarez?cc=5901" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://espnfc.com/news/story/_/id/13864 ... ez?cc=5901</a>

Cavani says of Suarez: "He even encourages me to play in England."

Pretty sure we have him. Makes a lot of sense to me, seeing as Suarez is just down the road and will probably stay at Anfield.

 

[MSP]

If Mancini stay I can see City definitely going out for Cavani. I guess he is his first target.

They are barely deadly target at Uruguay as that article says though, Uruguay scored 17 goals in 10 games in qualifiers, Cavani didn't even started yesterday but Forlan. He scored 5 goals in his last 2000 minutes for Uruguay and that doesn't look good at all and leaves the space for questions how he would cope outside of Napoli system.

 

[AntiUnited]

If Mancini stay I can see City definitely going out for Cavani. I guess he is his first target.

They are barely deadly target at Uruguay as that article says though, Uruguay scored 17 goals in 10 games in qualifiers, Cavani didn't even started yesterday but Forlan. He scored 5 goals in his last 2000 minutes for Uruguay and that doesn't look good at all and leaves the space for questions how he would cope outside of Napoli system.

worst signing possible and he dosent even suit are play

 

[MSP]

If Mancini stay I can see City definitely going out for Cavani. I guess he is his first target.

They are barely deadly target at Uruguay as that article says though, Uruguay scored 17 goals in 10 games in qualifiers, Cavani didn't even started yesterday but Forlan. He scored 5 goals in his last 2000 minutes for Uruguay and that doesn't look good at all and leaves the space for questions how he would cope outside of Napoli system.

worst signing possible and he dosent even suit are play

I'm definitely not too excited too but I'm afraid we're gonna see it if Mancini stays. Then we'll see how it would go..

 

[AntiUnited]

If Mancini stay I can see City definitely going out for Cavani. I guess he is his first target.

They are barely deadly target at Uruguay as that article says though, Uruguay scored 17 goals in 10 games in qualifiers, Cavani didn't even started yesterday but Forlan. He scored 5 goals in his last 2000 minutes for Uruguay and that doesn't look good at all and leaves the space for questions how he would cope outside of Napoli system.

worst signing possible and he dosent even suit are play

I'm definitely not too excited too but I'm afraid we're gonna see it if Mancini stays. Then we'll see how it would go..

i know ive said this many times before but spending a whole transfer kitty for one striker when our attack is not the problem is pure madness.Width is the first prio then midfield with pace then if we have some money left buy benteke as a punt or lukaku if chelski will sell

 

[NoahCity]

If Mancini stay I can see City definitely going out for Cavani. I guess he is his first target.

They are barely deadly target at Uruguay as that article says though, Uruguay scored 17 goals in 10 games in qualifiers, Cavani didn't even started yesterday but Forlan. He scored 5 goals in his last 2000 minutes for Uruguay and that doesn't look good at all and leaves the space for questions how he would cope outside of Napoli system.

worst signing possible and he dosent even suit are play

I'm definitely not too excited too but I'm afraid we're gonna see it if Mancini stays. Then we'll see how it would go..

dang, signing Cavani would not excite you guys? Seems like Falcao is getting hate too. So who would excite everyone? (besides Ronaldo/Messi).