I am actually. It's creating an easily defeated argument the opposition never made, usually to avoid conceding defeat.
I never said there was a conspiracy, I never mentioned 8 years in the CL. I've repeated your mistake of trying summarise our exit at the hands of Liverpool down to our defenders mistakes, when they wouldn't have mattered if the ref had got his decisions right.
Does that mean there is conspiracy? No but the ref was pivotal in both games and someone could easily take that game in isolation to say something was not quite right there. Who are you to tell them they can't? Why do you believe your opinion on that is so important?
I will also point out here's being an 8 year conspiracy and City being robbed in a high profile fixture are not mutually exclusive, you seem to be laying too much weight of your argument that they are. For someone so high and mighty, I would have thought you would have the intelligence not to make that mistake... perhaps preach a little less and try and understand the point being made first more too.
