Charlie Kirk shot dead at Utah university

There are some people who were they to die I'd celebrate with a seriously good glass of wine. Benjamin Netanyahu being top of the list.
I don't think anyone on here is suggesting that Mr Kirk was in that category and deserving of execution. On the other hand like a lot of religious people he held some pretty unpleasant beliefs. Whilst Christ seemed a decent bloke many of his followers are homophobic, ultra nationalist, extremely right wing and so on.
I think the world took a wrong step with monotheism and the cultures it spawned.
 
It'll be interesting to find out the background and motives of the shooter. Can't remember hearing much about the one that had a pop at trump once they caught him. I can understand why trump and Kirk get on people's tits, but shooting them seems a bit extreme.

The more interesting question to me is, for example, there was a poster yesterday on a removed thread trying to stir up racial tension over the Ukrainian girl murdered on the train.

I see that poster nowhere near this thread, but not one person I've seen on ANY social commentary has made out this could be a racial assassination, that's in the high extremes of a White killer to be sought.

As for the guy that had a 'pop' at Trump, his ID was erased within 48 hrs with nothing to be found on him and media, collectively, stopped talking about the "attempt" two weeks later, including Trump himself!

Now, it's like it never happened. Strange, non?
 
Agreed.

With that said, one doesn't have to feel empathy for someone who hated you being the target of the particular hate.

When you claim that the other side is evil and that you are on the side for goodness and forgiveness and that for someone to have views that you don't agree with is OK to be murdered then it's pretty shocking mate.

Murdering someone for their political views is obscene we both agree with that, but the same people who push inclusivity and kindness are far from that, bunch of deranged cunts.
 
Free speech
Hate speech
Shoot them
Punch a Nazi
Observe my pronouns or I will shoot you

Not the most liberal of people liberals to be fair.

I don't, particularly, like 'liberals' (I don't ever trust them), but do you not think as each President of late has gone to oneupmanship in behaviour and rhetoric? I feel that's reflected in the media of that time and echoed through social media.
 
And why would Steven Hawking ever need to boast about his IQ? Which was never in doubt.

But what if it had always been there, and doubted by some, who were subsequently proved to be manifestly wrong; then maybe that deserves a boast. In order to put those people straight.

On what planet does that chain of events make you a loser?
Ha! One of the referees on Hawkins PHD said his paper was complete nonsense and questioned his intelligence. That referee said that if the Big Bang had occurred, there would be some left over heat in the universe and obviously it didn’t exist. A few years later two American physicists won the Nobel prize for discovering and identifying that heat.
And the referee who doubted Hawking?……..Fred Hoyle.
 
When you claim that the other side is evil and that you are on the side for goodness and forgiveness and that for someone to have views that you don't agree with is OK to be murdered then it's pretty shocking mate.

Murdering someone for their political views is obscene we both agree with that, but the same people who push inclusivity and kindness are far from that, bunch of deranged cunts.
I wouldn't recommend the Charlie Kirk thread, then. If you suggest killing him was unjustified, you are a far right extremist according to most. Although I suspect there is a silent majority who just refuses to engage with this sort of radical crowd.
 
When you claim that the other side is evil and that you are on the side for goodness and forgiveness and that for someone to have views that you don't agree with is OK to be murdered then it's pretty shocking mate.

Murdering someone for their political views is obscene we both agree with that, but the same people who push inclusivity and kindness are far from that, bunch of deranged cunts.

I agree with most of that, but you're not addressing those that push divisive commentary and blame for the current state of the Western country the problems lie in.

Division is an agenda for distraction to take your eye off what the real issue is.
 
I don't, particularly, like 'liberals' (I don't ever trust them), but do you not think as each President of late has gone to oneupmanship in behaviour and rhetoric? I feel that's reflected in the media of that time and echoed through social media.

I don't think Biden put a single coherent sentence together and his presidency was a sham, politics is in the toilet and specially American politics (Ours isn't too far behind), however I draw the line at murder.

Some fucknut will think it's one sides fault when it isn't it's both extremes working in tandem, the right wing and left wing should sort their extremes out.

Pussy hats
NRA
Proud Boys
BLM

It's all just so much shit and worst of all the idiots over here start parroting what the mad yanks do.
 
Just read a NYT's article on the perpetual tragedy that is US gun ownership, and one statistic knocked me for six: there are more firearms in the US than there are people.

That's disturbing beyond words.
My Mormon Uncle had 7. Including a Magnum in his bedside drawer. For protection apparently. Ignore the fact that at the time he was 80 and slept attached to oxygen via a mask. Could barely pick his nose in under a minute let alone reach for a gun.
 
I don't think Biden put a single coherent sentence together and his presidency was a sham, politics is in the toilet and specially American politics (Ours isn't too far behind), however I draw the line at murder.

Some fucknut will think it's one sides fault when it isn't it's both extremes working in tandem, the right wing and left wing should sort their extremes out.

Pussy hats
NRA
Proud Boys
BLM

It's all just so much shit and worst of all the idiots over here start parroting what the mad yanks do.

Agreed.

It's all over BM and some of us get banned for pointing out division by extremists on the site.
 
I don’t do X, et al, so haven’t really heard of Kirk, or his views. Following his death, I had a look around and it looks like he was a very intelligent bloke who realised a gap in the market where political types were missing out on influencing the young, grooming some may say.

Made an absolute fortune from it, and listening to a young follower this morning on the radio, where he couldn’t wait to mention how Kirk had turned it into a ‘multi-100 million dollar’ business, it’s quite easy to see why people go down this line.

They’ve monetised it so much, they’re now part of the establishment.
 
The more interesting question to me is, for example, there was a poster yesterday on a removed thread trying to stir up racial tension over the Ukrainian girl murdered on the train.

I see that poster nowhere near this thread, but not one person I've seen on ANY social commentary has made out this could be a racial assassination, that's in the high extremes of a White killer to be sought.

As for the guy that had a 'pop' at Trump, his ID was erased within 48 hrs with nothing to be found on him and media, collectively, stopped talking about the "attempt" two weeks later, including Trump himself!

Now, it's like it never happened. Strange, non?
Didn't realise that thread had gone. Sad as it was, if she wasn't pretty and Ukrainian I doubt it would've got more than local coverage.
I do think it's strange nothing further has been heard about the trump shooter, but tbf I've not even done a cursory search and had forgotten it until now. Troubling times.

*edit* there is loads online about the trump shooter including a comprehensive wiki page. Says motive unknown, but I suppose if legal process is ongoing some things may be undisclosed.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top