Bigga
Well-Known Member
Charlie Kirk was either a justified, or acceptable murder?
I don't know what you're implying.
I said what I said on Kirk.
You can scroll above to see that.
Charlie Kirk was either a justified, or acceptable murder?
If you want omelettes, you gotta break eggs!As much as I feel sorry for his kids, there's a benefit to his supporters getting an unflinching look at what gun violence actually looks like.
It's not something that only happens in bad neighbourhoods or a number on a spreadsheet or a reporter stood outside a school retelling events whilst sparing details.
It's a person who is going about their business one second and the next he's got a massive fucking hole in his neck pissing out blood in front of countless helpless onlookers all panicking and wondering if they're next.
This is the reality for countless Americans and it is absurd that so many of those sheltered from directly witnessing the brutality of it will fight tooth and nail to maintain the circumstances that facilitate these events.
Although I feel like his absence from the planet will be a net positive, his vile words and actions are now frozen in time. Would have been nice to hear if he thinks all of this was still "worth it."
I'm not sure righteousness even comes into it. The primary thought is "This will REALLY piss the other side off, let's do it!" If it doesn't meet that bar, they're not interested.
Genuine question, handy in what means, do you think it will help you kill quicker, I think shooting someone with a Glock from 25 metres is quite easy your turning it into similar to an MP5, who you coming up against Al Qaeda? This is not a go at you I’m just interested why?I’d doubt this kid is a “professional marksman,” but rather an enthusiast.
I only mentioned the red dot, as it is a relatively inexpensive way to improve one’s accuracy from a reasonable range, and is all the rage with enthusiasts today.
Of course, any professional marksman or sniper would have commensurate equipment. I’m doubting he was either.
As a Glock owner, I’m actually looking at the Meta Tactical MX-1 Conversion Kit for them. Handy bit of kit for very little money. The rail is also quite suitable for a red dot sight and has been used for target accuracy reaching 200 yards…WITH A HANDGUN!!
That’s all to express how easy (sub $300) it is to turn a handgun into a distinctly more stable platform for longer distance shooting, all within the law, and hide it in a backpack. In fact, there are tons of what are known as “truck guns” that are small, expandable weapons that fold out into a more operationally efficient package, and they can all be hidden in a backpack just the like one on the guy being flagged as the POI.
I don't know what you're aiming to say here. He's recorded at attacking his own sister, so his family that have been asking for him to get help for his severe schizophrenia means they're "covering for his cuntishness"?
I respect genuine dialogue, but your insistence that he needs jailing instead of the help he should have been getting is veering into divisive terrority, when this unfortunate tragedy could and should have been avoided by the Gov funding the needs for these individuals.
I wonder what it will take for you to understand that funding the police and expanding more prisons over tackling the homelessness crisis and offering mental health treatment does not make the US a safer place.
Those who have the real power want a world where no human has a sense of cultural, national, theological, or civic self.
If you want omelettes, you gotta break eggs!
You want 2A, you gotta accept a few gun deaths!
At least, THAT is what he said when innocent children were slaughtered at school…so I guess he donated himself to the cause by dying by gun, at a school!
Btw, can anyone name a single child who was slaughtered at Sandy Hook? NO, I’m sure not, but the Right wants us to lionize the death of this Right Wing bigot?
FUCK THAT!
There is no effective infact no even a token mental health service in most of the world.
The wider point mate is that if you murder someone for their political views you're a **** and if you support that murder you're a ****.
From Lincoln to MLK to this young lad if you support any one of those murders you're an unfit human being.
Now what did I say about liberals again?
The **** is a career criminal, mental illness does not totally absolve him of what he has done and did, that's an insult to every mentally ill person out there.
Sergei awaits him.
I don't know what you're implying.
I said what I said on Kirk.
You can scroll above to see that.
I know in a lot of ways this is difficult to answer, because it'd be a sliding doors moment, but how would you feel if someone had murdered Hitler in 1932 or so? Or maybe that would be too soon as we wouldn't see the damage that he would cause, maybe 1940 would be better for that?
I do agree with your general point though.
Are you saying offer nothing or that there's not enough of these services?
Your comment is ambiguous.
According to your statement, my family should have gone to prison to deal with their crisis alone.
Charlie Kirk in 2023: "It's worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year, so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights...That is a prudent deal."I don't think he has ever said deaths are a good thing.
I just don't think expressing any opinion should endanger his or anybody's life. We need some boundaries somewhere. We can't justify death just because someone occasionally said something stupid or irresponsible. We all did. If a woman walks home at night in a miniskirt through a dark alley, it's putting her at risk, but it doesn't mean it's her fault if she gets raped. We can't allow victim blaming.
People will believe what they want to believe. That's okay. Some believe City are scum, some believe United are Scum, some believe Liverpool are scum, and some believe we are all scum. I naively believed that this will be some common ground like let's all condemn violence and say this is a despicable crime. For me, murder is always wrong. We shouldn't be debating whether it's justified. For me, that's horrible.
I can't even say I would agree with that either, maybe I would go back in time and KNOWING the threat I would implement or try to implement obstacles to prevent him getting to power.
Offer the little bastard an art scholarship in Prague or something.
Even your genuine honest question brings to mind that question "Who is evil?" we always say Hitler and he was but nobody seems to put Stalin and his tubby custard moustache in the same bracket.
Assassinating someone you don't agree with politically is and should be abhorrent IMHO full stop, this murder will give politicians on both sides of the aisle free reign to implement stuff they could never have gotten away with before.
I'm going to assume you mean we, the people?
We, the divided people.
Because the US set the tone that corporation are equal to people, so have the same voting influence as people. Lobbying politicians for their own agenda and searching for corrupt politicians seduced by wealth. Those politicians vote for the corporation agenda of of wealth, weaponry resource capture and regime change.
Those corps have you fighting amongst yourselves funding talking points, creating fervor so that you don't look at what they're doing.
Under Trump this is more transparent than it's ever been with the likes of Stephen Miller in the government close to Trump's ear. You'll hear that in certain speeches made.
I don't know how much you know about anything that goes on in the US, but their current behaviour is affecting everyone on the planet.
Fair response. I could have said many leaders, Hitler is the easy go to for 'evil' though. But I'd also suggest that leaders shouldn't implement plans that make millions suffer. That's what led to the French Revolution.
Youre right about the political response though. I see Trump has already blamed the left despite not have a clue who's done it. Whether he's actually wanted to jump the gun (bad choice of words perhaps) and enjoy the division it brings is another question. There are multiple possible sides who could have wanted to do this, to create this exact response from Trump.
Okay, I get it. You think I'm making 'liberal' commentary.
You don't think early intervention into his schizophrenia would have changed anything.
That's an insult to mental health treatment. I say this because I have family that had care under mental health for this and don't have the irrational, uncontrollable impulses they once had. They still have some issues, but the severity has been diminished greatly and I regard that as a success story.
According to your statement, my family should have gone to prison to deal with their crisis alone.
Well, we'll not agree here.