Cheating Refs

moomba said:
dctid said:
Karma - they should have got something out of the game earlier i think we can all agree on that

Only if you consider the decisions that went against them on the day and ignore the ones that went against us.

You need to look at it in the round over a number of games

The Silva offside against Southampton was ridiculas, Vinny commented on the Yaya dive.

We lost today simply because we played like a bunch of cnuts for the first 30 minutes. I and i suspect most City fans expect Pool to go for it in the first 30 minutes which they did and forwhatever reason we failed to hold them or match then both physically and in the work rate
 
BigOscar said:
malg said:
We've had a few decisions in our favour this year as well. I know feelings are still raw right now, but it is swings and roundabouts.
We've had the odd decision, here and there, as we have also had against us, but never so many massive ones in one game. 3 stonewall penalties and deliberately choosing to ignore the rules of the games with Suarez's second yellow is not just an honest mistake, it's clearly favouring one team. That's before you even get started on the yellow cards, soft freekicks, Skrtels constant shirt pulling and injury time
One thing I'll give you is the Skrtel thing. How in God's fucking name does he get away with it game, after game, after game? Surely every fucking ref in the land knows about it now.
 
malg said:
BigOscar said:
malg said:
We've had a few decisions in our favour this year as well. I know feelings are still raw right now, but it is swings and roundabouts.
We've had the odd decision, here and there, as we have also had against us, but never so many massive ones in one game. 3 stonewall penalties and deliberately choosing to ignore the rules of the games with Suarez's second yellow is not just an honest mistake, it's clearly favouring one team. That's before you even get started on the yellow cards, soft freekicks, Skrtels constant shirt pulling and injury time
One thing I'll give you is the Skrtel thing. How in God's fucking name does he get away with it game, after game, after game? Surely every fucking ref in the land knows about it now.
It's the Stoke thuggery/Rooney swearing at the ref problem. "If I give it every time then I'd be giving 20 penalties a game". Utter bullshit, players who consistently foul or abuse officials are allowed to do it, but if someone who doesn't do it usually does it once then they get leaped on.
 
malg said:
BigOscar said:
malg said:
We've had a few decisions in our favour this year as well. I know feelings are still raw right now, but it is swings and roundabouts.
We've had the odd decision, here and there, as we have also had against us, but never so many massive ones in one game. 3 stonewall penalties and deliberately choosing to ignore the rules of the games with Suarez's second yellow is not just an honest mistake, it's clearly favouring one team. That's before you even get started on the yellow cards, soft freekicks, Skrtels constant shirt pulling and injury time
One thing I'll give you is the Skrtel thing. How in God's fucking name does he get away with it game, after game, after game? Surely every fucking ref in the land knows about it now.
It's like Fellaini. Everyone knows he is a disgusting player who is a serial elbower yet I can't remember him ever being sent off for it. Same for Charlie Adam, he can kick lumps out of anyone without punishment.

Just very poor by the referee's association to not crack down on them. The persistent foulers are more dangerous than the divers, though both are twats.
 
Esteban de la Sexface said:
they aren't all against us. sometimes you just have to admit you just aren't good enough. we've lost all the games that counted this season bar the fizzy cup. chelsea at home. barca. wigan at home and now this.

Utter tosh. You have just listed four games we have lost. Two of those were when we went out of cups. These are not 'all the games that counted this season'. Arsenal at home when they were flying high. Two league derbies. Chelsea in the cup. Liverpool and Everton at home. Bayern away. Spurs. Newcastle away when they became exempt from punishment after an incorrectly disallowed goal.

No team ever wins 100% of their big games. As long as you win >50% of them plus all the others, then you stand a good chance of achieving. It is the silly defeats that might prove costly this season.
 
dctid said:
moomba said:
dctid said:
Karma - they should have got something out of the game earlier i think we can all agree on that

Only if you consider the decisions that went against them on the day and ignore the ones that went against us.

You need to look at it in the round over a number of games

The Silva offside against Southampton was ridiculas, Vinny commented on the Yaya dive.

We lost today simply because we played like a bunch of cnuts for the first 30 minutes. I and i suspect most City fans expect Pool to go for it in the first 30 minutes which they did and forwhatever reason we failed to hold them or match then both physically and in the work rate


Every time we lose it's the refs fault. I've yet to read one post match thread where the ref isn't blamed when we don't take 3 points.

When a decision goes in our favour like the Silva offside last week, some will still not say we got lucky. It's fan blindness that's all clubs fans suffer from.

We got the bum deal today, we have had the rub of the green on occasion.

It's the defeats against Cardiff, Sunderland and Villa that will ultimately seal our fate. No side winning the league should lose against two relegation sides and one just above.
 
Millwallawayveteran1988 said:
dctid said:
moomba said:
Only if you consider the decisions that went against them on the day and ignore the ones that went against us.

You need to look at it in the round over a number of games

The Silva offside against Southampton was ridiculas, Vinny commented on the Yaya dive.

We lost today simply because we played like a bunch of cnuts for the first 30 minutes. I and i suspect most City fans expect Pool to go for it in the first 30 minutes which they did and forwhatever reason we failed to hold them or match then both physically and in the work rate


Every time we lose it's the refs fault. I've yet to read one post match thread where the ref isn't blamed when we don't take 3 points.

When a decision goes in our favour like the Silva offside last week, some will still not say we got lucky. It's fan blindness that's all clubs fans suffer from.

We got the bum deal today, we have had the rub of the green on occasion.

It's the defeats against Cardiff, Sunderland and Villa that will ultimately seal our fate. No side winning the league should lose against two relegation sides and one just above.

That's true.

But Suarez should have got a 2nd yellow for the dive. I was yards from the incident, row 13, and it was as clear as day.

As it stands, if a player dives and tries to win a penalty, it's a straight yellow. Suarez should have gone. Clattenburg bottled that decision. You could see the City players going up to him after the incident and having words.
 
malg said:
We've had a few decisions in our favour this year as well. I know feelings are still raw right now, but it is swings and roundabouts.
We've had more go against us which Have directly affected the result,biggest game of the season in the prem and Clattenberg shit it .
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
Boney said:
Barcon said:
Anyone that doesn't think the Dzeko penalty was stonewall is just as bad as clattenberg.
even carragher at half time along with all the other 'so-called' experts said it was a pen.
The experts know fuck all to be honest. They talk about "contact" but that's not the test. It's intent.

Sakho missed the ball AND Dzeko. If he's caught him in that first movement then yes, penalty 100%. But he didn't and Dzeko sort of made contact as he was gong through then decided to fall. If he goes down as Sakho comes in then he'll get the penalty but he didn't.
I remember an incident a few seasons ago, coincidentally involving Liverpool, in their match against Sheffield United. Gerrard broke into the box and ran onto the ball, a Sheffield United defender slid in across Gerrard, who had to hurdle the challenge. The challenge missed both the ball and Gerrard, Gerrard was off balance and put his shot wide. The referee gave Liverpool a penalty. For me that was very reminiscent of Dzeko's today. The only reason Dzeko wasn;t taken out by Sakho was he leapt into the air to try and clear him, he didn't manage this and landed with his left leg on Sakho, at which point he (rather theatrically) fell to the floor. Should he have allowed Sakho to absolutely clean him out? Should have HAVE to do that for it to be a foul? Not for me.
 
jrb said:
Millwallawayveteran1988 said:
dctid said:
You need to look at it in the round over a number of games

The Silva offside against Southampton was ridiculas, Vinny commented on the Yaya dive.

We lost today simply because we played like a bunch of cnuts for the first 30 minutes. I and i suspect most City fans expect Pool to go for it in the first 30 minutes which they did and forwhatever reason we failed to hold them or match then both physically and in the work rate


Every time we lose it's the refs fault. I've yet to read one post match thread where the ref isn't blamed when we don't take 3 points.

When a decision goes in our favour like the Silva offside last week, some will still not say we got lucky. It's fan blindness that's all clubs fans suffer from.

We got the bum deal today, we have had the rub of the green on occasion.

It's the defeats against Cardiff, Sunderland and Villa that will ultimately seal our fate. No side winning the league should lose against two relegation sides and one just above.

That's true.

But Suarez should have got a 2nd yellow for the dive. I was yards from the incident, row 13, and it was as clear as day.

As it stands, if a player dives and tries to win a penalty, it's a straight yellow. Suarez should have gone. Clattenburg bottled that decision. You could see the City players going up to him after the incident and having words.

I totally agree. We got a crap hand today but it shouldn't have come down to this game. Home sides generally get the big decisions.
 
BigOscar said:
malg said:
We've had a few decisions in our favour this year as well. I know feelings are still raw right now, but it is swings and roundabouts.
We've had the odd decision, here and there, as we have also had against us, but never so many massive ones in one game. 3 stonewall penalties and deliberately choosing to ignore the rules of the games with Suarez's second yellow is not just an honest mistake, it's clearly favouring one team. That's before you even get started on the yellow cards, soft freekicks, Skrtels constant shirt pulling and injury time

Come off it mate, the Dzeko pen can't be stone wall. Dezko successfully hurdled the challenge and then threw himself to the floor. Had he just allowed himself to be clattered, then it would doubtless have been given, but he didn't. It could have been given, but I could see why it wasn't and no way was it "stone wall'".

The Skyrtel handball was missed by 40,000 people, including all the City fans. So that's not a stone wall pen either. And the Silva one, was arguably a foul by Silva.

I am not saying none of them were pens, and perhaps we should have had one. But Vinny's manhandling of Suarez in the box went unpunished and could easily have been given.

I have no beef about the refereeing really, other than perhaps not sending Jaws off for diving, But how often do you see that happen? We know it's against the rules, but I can't remember a player getting a red for it.

We lost this because we allowed ourselves to go 2-0 down by playing like complete dicks for the first 35 minutes and then gifting them the winner. The ref didn't help us, but he didn't need to help them, we lost it all on our own.
 
the "occasion" got to clatenburg today , dzeko was a nailed on penalty and the buck teeth cheat should have walked , in fairness i dont think anyone saw the skirtel volleyball move , but clattenburg bottled it .
 
Chippy_boy said:
BigOscar said:
malg said:
We've had a few decisions in our favour this year as well. I know feelings are still raw right now, but it is swings and roundabouts.
We've had the odd decision, here and there, as we have also had against us, but never so many massive ones in one game. 3 stonewall penalties and deliberately choosing to ignore the rules of the games with Suarez's second yellow is not just an honest mistake, it's clearly favouring one team. That's before you even get started on the yellow cards, soft freekicks, Skrtels constant shirt pulling and injury time

Come off it mate, the Dzeko pen can't be stone wall. Dezko successfully hurdled the challenge and then threw himself to the floor. Had he just allowed himself to be clattered, then it would doubtless have been given, but he didn't. It could have been given, but I could see why it wasn't and no way was it "stone wall'".

The Skyrtel handball was missed by 40,000 people, including all the City fans. So that's not a stone wall pen either. And the Silva one, was arguably a foul by Silva.

I am not saying none of them were pens, and perhaps we should have had one. But Vinny's manhandling of Suarez in the box went unpunished and could easily have been given.

I have no beef about the refereeing really, other than perhaps not sending Jaws off for diving, But how often do you see that happen? We know it's against the rules, but I can't remember a player getting a red for it.

We lost this because we allowed ourselves to go 2-0 down by playing like complete dicks for the first 35 minutes and then gifting them the winner. The ref didn't help us, but he didn't need to help them, we lost it all on our own.

Bellamy
 
Barcon said:
Chippy_boy said:
BigOscar said:
We've had the odd decision, here and there, as we have also had against us, but never so many massive ones in one game. 3 stonewall penalties and deliberately choosing to ignore the rules of the games with Suarez's second yellow is not just an honest mistake, it's clearly favouring one team. That's before you even get started on the yellow cards, soft freekicks, Skrtels constant shirt pulling and injury time

Come off it mate, the Dzeko pen can't be stone wall. Dezko successfully hurdled the challenge and then threw himself to the floor. Had he just allowed himself to be clattered, then it would doubtless have been given, but he didn't. It could have been given, but I could see why it wasn't and no way was it "stone wall'".

The Skyrtel handball was missed by 40,000 people, including all the City fans. So that's not a stone wall pen either. And the Silva one, was arguably a foul by Silva.

I am not saying none of them were pens, and perhaps we should have had one. But Vinny's manhandling of Suarez in the box went unpunished and could easily have been given.

I have no beef about the refereeing really, other than perhaps not sending Jaws off for diving, But how often do you see that happen? We know it's against the rules, but I can't remember a player getting a red for it.

We lost this because we allowed ourselves to go 2-0 down by playing like complete dicks for the first 35 minutes and then gifting them the winner. The ref didn't help us, but he didn't need to help them, we lost it all on our own.

Bellamy
Torres and various others. As for the Skrtel handabll not being a stonewall penalty because you didn't see it? Seriously? Intentionally handling the ball is a stonewall penalty, no doubt about it. As for Dzeko "falling over", he gets tripped by Sakho's corpse on the way down from hurdling the "challenge", again I don't see how that's anything but a stonewall penalty.
 
Anyone remember our offside goal against the dippers on boxing day?

Swings and roundabouts, they had every right to feel aggrieved in the home tie as we have today with the referees. Blame the players.
 
BigOscar said:
Barcon said:
Chippy_boy said:
Come off it mate, the Dzeko pen can't be stone wall. Dezko successfully hurdled the challenge and then threw himself to the floor. Had he just allowed himself to be clattered, then it would doubtless have been given, but he didn't. It could have been given, but I could see why it wasn't and no way was it "stone wall'".

The Skyrtel handball was missed by 40,000 people, including all the City fans. So that's not a stone wall pen either. And the Silva one, was arguably a foul by Silva.

I am not saying none of them were pens, and perhaps we should have had one. But Vinny's manhandling of Suarez in the box went unpunished and could easily have been given.

I have no beef about the refereeing really, other than perhaps not sending Jaws off for diving, But how often do you see that happen? We know it's against the rules, but I can't remember a player getting a red for it.

We lost this because we allowed ourselves to go 2-0 down by playing like complete dicks for the first 35 minutes and then gifting them the winner. The ref didn't help us, but he didn't need to help them, we lost it all on our own.

Bellamy
Torres and various others. As for the Skrtel handabll not being a stonewall penalty because you didn't see it? Seriously? Intentionally handling the ball is a stonewall penalty, no doubt about it. As for Dzeko "falling over", he gets tripped by Sakho's corpse on the way down from hurdling the "challenge", again I don't see how that's anything but a stonewall penalty.

I didn't think the Dzeko one was nailed on. 50/50. In fact Dzeko made a mess of getting it. As for the handball, the players didn't see, the crowd didn't see it so to is also conceivable that clattenberg didn't see it either.

We got the raw end of the deal ref wise today but shit happens. If you trawl back through every post match game thread where we have lost you will see the ref blamed in one way or another. He didn't concede 3 goals for us.
 
I'm sorry but justifying not giving a pen for skrtel's handball because fans didn't see it real time doesn't do it for me. Fans are watching from the stand or on tv and are there to watch the game. Referees are on the pitch right on the spot, yards from the play, supposedly there to watch for things like that and ensure a fair game, not just to enjoy the spectacle. There is no excuse for him not seeing it just because some fans didn't see it
 
BigOscar said:
Barcon said:
Chippy_boy said:
Come off it mate, the Dzeko pen can't be stone wall. Dezko successfully hurdled the challenge and then threw himself to the floor. Had he just allowed himself to be clattered, then it would doubtless have been given, but he didn't. It could have been given, but I could see why it wasn't and no way was it "stone wall'".

The Skyrtel handball was missed by 40,000 people, including all the City fans. So that's not a stone wall pen either. And the Silva one, was arguably a foul by Silva.

I am not saying none of them were pens, and perhaps we should have had one. But Vinny's manhandling of Suarez in the box went unpunished and could easily have been given.

I have no beef about the refereeing really, other than perhaps not sending Jaws off for diving, But how often do you see that happen? We know it's against the rules, but I can't remember a player getting a red for it.

We lost this because we allowed ourselves to go 2-0 down by playing like complete dicks for the first 35 minutes and then gifting them the winner. The ref didn't help us, but he didn't need to help them, we lost it all on our own.

Bellamy
Torres and various others. As for the Skrtel handabll not being a stonewall penalty because you didn't see it? Seriously? Intentionally handling the ball is a stonewall penalty, no doubt about it. As for Dzeko "falling over", he gets tripped by Sakho's corpse on the way down from hurdling the "challenge", again I don't see how that's anything but a stonewall penalty.

I can remember two from Clattenburg himself. Bellamy (versus Bolton) and Torres for Chelsea against Utd last season.
 
Chippy_boy said:
BigOscar said:
malg said:
We've had a few decisions in our favour this year as well. I know feelings are still raw right now, but it is swings and roundabouts.
We've had the odd decision, here and there, as we have also had against us, but never so many massive ones in one game. 3 stonewall penalties and deliberately choosing to ignore the rules of the games with Suarez's second yellow is not just an honest mistake, it's clearly favouring one team. That's before you even get started on the yellow cards, soft freekicks, Skrtels constant shirt pulling and injury time

Come off it mate, the Dzeko pen can't be stone wall. Dezko successfully hurdled the challenge and then threw himself to the floor. Had he just allowed himself to be clattered, then it would doubtless have been given, but he didn't. It could have been given, but I could see why it wasn't and no way was it "stone wall'".

The Skyrtel handball was missed by 40,000 people, including all the City fans. So that's not a stone wall pen either. And the Silva one, was arguably a foul by Silva.

I am not saying none of them were pens, and perhaps we should have had one. But Vinny's manhandling of Suarez in the box went unpunished and could easily have been given.

I have no beef about the refereeing really, other than perhaps not sending Jaws off for diving, But how often do you see that happen? We know it's against the rules, but I can't remember a player getting a red for it.

We lost this because we allowed ourselves to go 2-0 down by playing like complete dicks for the first 35 minutes and then gifting them the winner. The ref didn't help us, but he didn't need to help them, we lost it all on our own.

Well said. All this blaming the red bullshit.
I HATE TWATTRMBERG. But if I take off my blue specs - he was alright today tbh.

We lost for several reasons and none of them really being the ref.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top