Ched Evans - serious injury

[kaz7]

The conviction has been quashed so it has indeed been over turned at this stage.

Then why does he have to go through a retrial?

 

[worsleyweb]

Then why does he have to go through a retrial?

He is innocent again now Karen until he is proven guilty. Back to square one.

 

[SWP's back]

Then why does he have to go through a retrial?

Because the complainant is refusing to drop the complaint?

Whether she is even able to now and what the ramifications would be at this stage I don't know.

 

[kaz7]

He is innocent again now Karen until he is proven guilty. Back to square one.

I see,all will be revealed in regards to the new evidence

 

[worsleyweb]

I see,all will be revealed in regards to the new evidence[/QUOTE

am guessing he will be in all probability be found not guilty. But is clearly a bit of a cont. no winners here.

 

[bluetev]

I am interested in what the new evidence is,i can't think it is enough to overturn the conviction as there is a retrial,i'm only guessing though

I am more interested in knowing what was the "old" evidence that proved conclusively that the lady was drunk and incapable of giving consent when Evans arrived, because the only solid piece of evidence - the hotel video - seems to suggest she wasn't anywhere near that drunk at that point.

 

[worsleyweb]

I am more interested in knowing what was the "old" evidence that proved conclusively that the lady was drunk and incapable of giving consent when Evans arrived, because the only solid piece of evidence - the hotel video - seems to suggest she wasn't anywhere near that drunk at that point.

Ealing blue is your man. He knows the case very well.

 

[kaz7]

I am more interested in knowing what was the "old" evidence that proved conclusively that the lady was drunk and incapable of giving consent when Evans arrived, because the only solid piece of evidence - the hotel video - seems to suggest she wasn't anywhere near that drunk at that point.

I think i will follow it more closely this time as i did the johnson one

 

[bluetev]

I hope all the cunts (led by the execrable Charlie Webster who touted herself around every current affairs show going) who lined up to give him a good kicking will be as keen to eat some humble pie and apologize unreservedly to Ched, hopefully in person live on C4 news / Newsnight, when the formality of a retrial is completed.

Meanwhile the scumbag who cried wolf is of course protected by the law and free to do as she pleases despite the enormous cost to the state of her bogus allegations

From what I read she was unable to remember anything in the morning, and police decided to press rape charges - that decision was police, not hers.

Whatever be the case a couple of things are clear.
The threshold for rape prosecution has been set rather low, because what condition she was in the morning was immaterial, what mattered was could she give consent in the night when the incident occurred, and nobody, not even herself could be certain.

And whether rape or not, Evans is a utter, complete scumbag. Maybe I am old fashioned but you don't sleep with someone and leave her in that state. Apparently she was naked and disorientated in the morning, what kind of jackass leaves a girl alone in a strange hotel room?

 

[EalingBlue2]

Why was he found guilty though? What's come to light now? Was was buried?

Someone, somewhere has fucked up big time.

If he's acquitted he's lost the best playing days of his career and had his life ruined. And all because he was a cock. There but for the grace of Thor went several City players at that time in their lives, players who are all settled down and married now.

I am not sure any other City players engaged in things in quite this way, truth is guilty or not guilty and whatever the verdict( unless the new evidence is extreme there will still be doubt ) he has played a bery big part in his downfall . Had he played the ball instead of the man, had he spent his time dealing with the case on the facts not being outraged that someone would even date to question his God life self, then whether he was guilty or not he would have probably got off. He will also never get the redemption he wants as whatever the verdict he has shown himself a contemptible person in front of the public and that perception in public and media is unlikely to change . Which makes you wonder is he doing it all for himself as he doesn't even believe he is innocent.