- 1 Aug 2009
But they had two goals chalked off by VAR, one being pretty tight. I think 1-2 flattered us.Yes but the first goal had an element of luck, most of those don't go in or are saved, and the second one was definitely luck. That and the Sterling pen we didn't get, and it's a different story. My point is if that's Chelsea's best for the CL final I'll take it.
Less of a foul is foul which means its a penalty. If there is a contact in the penalty box which there clearly was then its a penalty. Did you think neither of them were a penalties?im not sure how people can think theres some corruption when jesus got a penalty for less of a foul that zouma made on sterling.
some you win some you lose deal with
Don't have an account?Register now!