Chelsea Thread 2014/15

NorthEastScotlandMCFC said:
There team looks so strong

1033306_Chelsea.jpg


I think they under-performed in the League last season but yet there results against the top 4 were the strongest.
Man Utd 0-0 Chelsea
Chelsea 2-1 Man City
Arsenal 0-0 Chelsea
Chelsea 2-1 Liverpool
Chelsea 3-1 Man Utd
Man City 0-1 Chelsea
Chelsea 6-0 Arsenal
Liverpool 0-2 Chelsea

You can't tell me that their first 11 doesn't look strong, add to that the strength in depth they have in there squad.

The game at the Bridge could have gone either way but we were dominated at the Etihad.
Only Bayern and Dortmund made this type of performance against us where you could clearly see we were the weaker team on the day.
They bossed the midfield against us and Matic dominated YaYa

At this point in the transfer window they should be considered clear favourites
Are we also forgetting the fact we were without Fernandinho, Aguero and was it Silva? Against them. Big losses to the team.
 
supercity88 said:
Shown a lot of fight to win the league last season where Chelsea bottled it..
Where & when did Chelsea bottle it? was it against City/ no they beat city twice, liverpool then, no they beat them twice so that leaves
arsenal or utd no neither of them, it was because they could not beat without a decent striker the lower league clubs, so no bottle job unlike city who have to thank chelsea for their league title win. as they where the bottlers along with liverfools.
 
badenblue said:
supercity88 said:
Shown a lot of fight to win the league last season where Chelsea bottled it..
Where & when did Chelsea bottle it? was it against City/ no they beat city twice, liverpool then, no they beat them twice so that leaves
arsenal or utd no neither of them, it was because they could not beat without a decent striker the lower league clubs, so no bottle job unlike city who have to thank chelsea for their league title win. as they where the bottlers along with liverfools.

Against the poorer teams no good beating the likes of us and Liverpool if you can't beat the others when it mattered!
 
Chelsea have got a really good team for next season but honestly I'd only have 3 of there players in city's team so think we are stronger than them keeper hazard and terry!
 
NorthEastScotlandMCFC said:
There team looks so strong

1033306_Chelsea.jpg


I think they under-performed in the League last season but yet there results against the top 4 were the strongest.
Man Utd 0-0 Chelsea
Chelsea 2-1 Man City
Arsenal 0-0 Chelsea
Chelsea 2-1 Liverpool
Chelsea 3-1 Man Utd
Man City 0-1 Chelsea
Chelsea 6-0 Arsenal
Liverpool 0-2 Chelsea

You can't tell me that their first 11 doesn't look strong, add to that the strength in depth they have in there squad.

The game at the Bridge could have gone either way but we were dominated at the Etihad.
Only Bayern and Dortmund made this type of performance against us where you could clearly see we were the weaker team on the day.
They bossed the midfield against us and Matic dominated YaYa

At this point in the transfer window they should be considered clear favourites
The rags were not top 4 mate :-)
 
uwe rosler 28 said:
I think we could learn a trick or 2 of chelsea about how to buy a couple of mediocre players put them on the bench and then flog them for double what they paid for them!

The Luiz deal stinks to high heaven. He isn't worth half of what PSG paid, something rotten has gone on there.
 
Oh dear, SSN just quoted Wikipedia saying it says Felipe Luis is already a Chelsea player. That really just happened.
 
badenblue said:
supercity88 said:
Shown a lot of fight to win the league last season where Chelsea bottled it..
Where & when did Chelsea bottle it? was it against City/ no they beat city twice, liverpool then, no they beat them twice so that leaves
arsenal or utd no neither of them, it was because they could not beat without a decent striker the lower league clubs, so no bottle job unlike city who have to thank chelsea for their league title win. as they where the bottlers along with liverfools.
We had to have both Liverpool and Chelsea to fuck it at one point in April. They both did. Ergo bottled in some people's concepts, and if they lost it against the 'lesser' sides - then wouldn't that make them even bigger bottle jobs?

We do not have Chelsea to thank, we have ourselves to thank for amassing 86 points throughout the season, and more than any other team. We won the last four when it mattered, the other teams did not. We focus on our own results, other teams focus on theirs. That's the point of it being a 9 month long season and every team playing every other team twice. Or should we write a public letter of thanks to both of those clubs for 'helping us' win the league.
 
Is it correct Chelsea had 28 players out on loan last season?, if it is then that is just ridiculous.
There has to be more concise rules regarding loans, only x to the same league as you and x to teams in the EU.
They will own half the players in the top 5 leagues at this rate.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.