Wow 80% as much as that eh, Love a bit of generalisation in the afternoon smells like....laziness
Chelsea are efficient when they need to be most of the time but like against PSG he is too scared to lose and sometimes will screw up because of his negative tactics.
If we were in the same position with 5 games to go, I wouldn't want my manager taking stupid risks. The problem with Maureen is he amasses the best talent for every position and in most cases best 2 players in Europe and plays negative tactics even when it's not really required.
George Graham's title winning side had the best defenders in the league by a country mile but not even a deluded goner would say n every other position we had the best players. He tailored the team to ther strength whch was to not concede because they couldn't score many.
But Maureen has, Hazard the best attacking player, Fabregas the best creator of chances, Matic the best CM, a back 4 that is(bar Cahill) immense. He doesn't play them to their strengths. Chelsea are good enough to hammer pretty much all bar a couple of teams with regular 3-0,4-1 score lines and still win the league. City, United and Arsene Wenger's Arsenal did it.
Chelsea fans are happy with playing like that now because it's a weak Arsenal/City/United up against them and they are just desperate to win the league so they'll accept it. When the others get stronger and sometimes the gamble fails like it started to do in 2006/07 then it'll be the Chelsea fans calling it boring. Just like they did in 2007.
Mourinho-ball has a shelf life with any team before they get sick of it,players and fans.