But but but, his money is filthy oil money…….oh, as you were…he is not an Arab or a Muslim. Just ordinary oil money, then.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Chelsea Thread - 2021/22
- Thread starter MAG
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
But but but, his money is filthy oil money…….oh, as you were…he is not an Arab or a Muslim. Just ordinary oil money, then.
I mean, it's not like the origins of his money hasn't been criticised for pillar to post. It's not like Chelsea's success hasn't been dismissed by supposed football purists. Yeah sure the attention on Chelsea has diminished over the year due to the focus on City and PSG, I accept that but trust me, Chelsea fans have to take the same lumps City fans have over the years.
Gray
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 30 May 2004
- Messages
- 25,830
- Team supported
- ABU & The Bus Wreckers
You liked the mate of Putin then? He was nothing more than a member of the Russian Mafia.Well put it this way, I wouldn't swap owners with City if the chance was offered to me at any point in the last 15 years.
Absolute bollocks that, just someone put it on twtter. Leicester owe £70m, PSG £80m, Bayern M, Villa, Leeds Zero as examples with hundreds of other clubs.Should also say, the only debt free clubs in Europe is PSG, City, Leicester, and now Chelsea :)
Not really. UEFA did not concoct a fake case against Chelsea. You should read the comments by CAS on the conduct of the enquiry. “Manchester City have no chance of a fair hearing“I mean, it's not like the origins of his money hasn't been criticised for pillar to post. It's not like Chelsea's success hasn't been dismissed by supposed football purists. Yeah sure the attention on Chelsea has diminished over the year due to the focus on City and PSG, I accept that but trust me, Chelsea fans have to take the same lumps City fans have over the years.
You liked the mate of Putin then? He was nothing more than a member of the Russian Mafia.
Come on, did you miss the bit where I said purely in terms of football ownership? Please read the context the post was written in before chiming in :)
mexico1970
Well-Known Member
I mean, it's not like the origins of his money hasn't been criticised for pillar to post. It's not like Chelsea's success hasn't been dismissed by supposed football purists. Yeah sure the attention on Chelsea has diminished over the year due to the focus on City and PSG, I accept that but trust me, Chelsea fans have to take the same lumps City fans have over the years.
Did you get banned from Europe? Even though your owner was a bona fida member of the Russian mafia.
You were most certainly not treated the same by the FA UEFA and the press.
Not really. UEFA did not concoct a fake case against Chelsea. You should read the comments by CAS on the conduct of the enquiry. “Manchester City have no chance of a fair hearing“
Oh sorry, I thought you just meant the public opinion and the media agendas/talking points. You're right about the football authorities. We've had next to no issues with them, that's true
Did you get banned from Europe? Even though your owner was a bona fida member of the Russian mafia.
You were most certainly not treated the same by the FA UEFA and the press.
Apologies, I didn't think of the authorities. You're both right. I think on the press front, we've taken similar lumps but it's a matter of degree I suppose/
Fair enough, it was just that one twitter post I saw to be fair.Absolute bollocks that, just someone put it on twtter. Leicester owe £70m, PSG £80m, Bayern M, Villa, Leeds Zero as examples with hundreds of other clubs.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.