Indaparkside
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2015
- Messages
- 14,971
See it’s kicking off with India and China, reported soldiers killed and wounded on both sides this is all the world needs right now.
When Kashmir and Ladakh became part of India.This pathetic line in the report sums it up...….
The fighting occurred in the precipitous, rocky terrain of the strategically important Galwan Valley, which lies between China's Tibet and India's Ladakh.
Since when did Tibet become part of China ? oh that's right when troops marched into a peaceful country and seized control. When the world stops supporting a corrupt regime and starts demanding they start returning land/countries they seized then we might have peace in that area. Taiwan is next on the list.
This pathetic line in the report sums it up...….
The fighting occurred in the precipitous, rocky terrain of the strategically important Galwan Valley, which lies between China's Tibet and India's Ladakh.
Since when did Tibet become part of China ? oh that's right when troops marched into a peaceful country and seized control. When the world stops supporting a corrupt regime and starts demanding they start returning land/countries they seized then we might have peace in that area. Taiwan is next on the list.
When Kashmir and Ladakh became part of India.
Or when the Falklands became a British property.
Which was when the Chinese were weak and the British empire bead strong.
The examples are numerous.
Might has always been right, sadly.
Context is important and we shouldn't be selective in its application.
It’s not ridiculous at all. It’s perfectly apposite. We saw a territory - and we took it because we could.The Falklands is a ridiculous comparison.
There was no one there when we turned up and we put people on there, plus Argentina wasn’t even a country.
!
It’s not ridiculous at all. It’s perfectly apposite. We saw a territory - and we took it because we could.
What’s the difference?
Anyone else suddenly fancy a takeaway?