Bluesince1979
Well-Known Member
I think puma come up with the designsThanks. Do City set them a brief at all, or do Puma just go "hell, we fancy blue shorts this season" and City just let them have free rein?
he said the blue 3rd kit (man city- no badge) was a real hard sell to the club who werent sure at all but puma were very keen. As i say, puma have to make their money back so ultimately its down to them.
that shirt was a real slow burner and looked to be a failure but results like thumping sporting 5-0 in it bring a big sales spike
we sell 500,000 shirts per year. United about 2m.
fake kits, although a problem, are actually quite a compliment as they say in the industry that you havent really made it until they are selling your clubs fake kits in the far east. And the more fakes they sell the more genuine ones will be sold
any leaks of kits are just that. Leaks. Generally never my puma/city as a marketing ploy, usually could be something as daft as a plumber visiting HQ and spotting the kit on a mannequin and taking a sneaky pic