City’s New Kits

[melrose40yarder]

Its not that difficult a 5yr old could manage it.
Blue Shirt.
White Shorts.
Blue Socks.
If u like the socks can have a maroon band.
Simple

 

[Cellarite]

Nope not it

Did you actually read the post?

 

[Bluesince1979]

Did you actually read the post?

Sorry its just a t-shirt

 

[MeatHunterrr]

all kit manufacturers make trash kits, those than can afford big clubs that is (Nike, Puma, Adidas).

 

[Uwe`s Grandad]

Might as well be celtic ;-))

 

[ONTHERUNWITHTHAKSIN]

Might as well be celtic ;-))

More QPR

Serg scoring against them in 93.20 would presume

 

[Pingu the Penguin]

Imagine getting paid to come up with that? It’s probably got a watermark of Barton trying to kick serg

 

[Deleted member 77198]

all kit manufacturers make trash kits, those than can afford big clubs that is (Nike, Puma, Adidas).

Football kits for all clubs are almost always anything between not very nice to bloody awful. Italian clubs do a bit better than most.

I very rarely buy City shirts because we never really have good kits. And any we do are ruined by sponsors and the back panels.

Shirt sponsors ruin kits and always detract from them looking good aesthetically. As does the rule about player names and numbers on the back having to be on a panel of material that’s different to the front.

Those mosaic and Paisley kits we had last season looked like we couldn’t afford the material all the way round and had to finish the backs of the kits with a cheap generic panel.

Genoa have much more subtle shirt sponsor for their home kit (like our sash kit from 2010-11) and no sponsor for their away kits this season and their kits are the best around for it.

Brentford’s kit this season - don’t know if they’ve broken a rule with what they have this season but it looks so much better than generic back panels.

 

[Tom Connolly]

still no leaks at all, weird, feel like we have them by now usually

 

[dublinblue12]