Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
http://www.financialfairplay.co.uk/latest-news/will-city-pass-the-ffp-test-
Don't know how accurate it is but has us failing.
Don't know how accurate it is but has us failing.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City and FFP article
- Thread starter Cobwebcat
- Start date
TCIB
Well-Known Member
Say's we fail it but it means sod all.
It was designed to stop teams going bust and to see a year on year financial improvement is more than acceptable.
We will do this so meh it doesn't bother me at all.
What will irk me is if that midget frenchmen with a face like old porridge tries to abuse it to attack us just because he hates English footy and especially when his beloved Juve are a bunch of bent corrupt to the core twats he says fuck all.
He is a fucking disgrace and should hold no authority. I would spit in his face and not recognise his authority if i were the FA. He would back down because he is French, it is in his nature.
It was designed to stop teams going bust and to see a year on year financial improvement is more than acceptable.
We will do this so meh it doesn't bother me at all.
What will irk me is if that midget frenchmen with a face like old porridge tries to abuse it to attack us just because he hates English footy and especially when his beloved Juve are a bunch of bent corrupt to the core twats he says fuck all.
He is a fucking disgrace and should hold no authority. I would spit in his face and not recognise his authority if i were the FA. He would back down because he is French, it is in his nature.
Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
cookster said:Back of a match box! So on a projected turnover of 281M he thinks we'll fail?
By 63 million. I thought the moving in the right direction clause would save us but apparently not according to this guy. He seems to think that front loading of sponsor deal is only way to save ourselves but that UEFA won't allow it.
Cobwebcat said:cookster said:Back of a match box! So on a projected turnover of 281M he thinks we'll fail?
By 63 million. I thought the moving in the right direction clause would save us but apparently not according to this guy. He seems to think that front loading of sponsor deal is only way to save ourselves but that UEFA won't allow it.
I seriously doubt our costs will exceed 340M come season 12/13.
Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
cookster said:Cobwebcat said:cookster said:Back of a match box! So on a projected turnover of 281M he thinks we'll fail?
By 63 million. I thought the moving in the right direction clause would save us but apparently not according to this guy. He seems to think that front loading of sponsor deal is only way to save ourselves but that UEFA won't allow it.
I seriously doubt our costs will exceed 340M come season 12/13.
I sent the article to Prestwich Blue to see if he could make sense of it...too much for my brain. Hopefully he has a different take.
Perhaps winning the Prem will help with sponsorship deals. PSG and Malaga must have no chance!
Very conservative estimate on gate receipts - 10%. Ticket prices have gone up by 10% alone and then there's the Champions League gates. Also City's share of Champions League pot will go up next season as we are Champions
And I suspect our commercial incomes will increase a lot more as a result of being Champions. Are there no title bonuses from existing sponsors eg Umbro?
And I suspect our commercial incomes will increase a lot more as a result of being Champions. Are there no title bonuses from existing sponsors eg Umbro?
TCIB
Well-Known Member
Good man cobweb, math i do not mind saying bores the shit out of me and PB seems to be well clued up on every bit of this financial minefield.
S04
Well-Known Member
My projection has City failing the FFP test for the first Monitoring Period
Nothing will be decided on the first monitoring period anyway..