City approach FA about B team

sjk2008 said:
ColinLee said:
sjk2008 said:
OK, humour me.

Tell me why this proposal will be a good idea.

And not for you, for us lower league minnows.
According to you it's a bad idea because Chelsea's 'B' team(presuming they get promoted to League 1 in the first place) would be better than Oldham. At the moment there's 14 teams better than you, do you want to have them removed?
You do know that even if there were say 8 'B' teams finishing above you they wouldn't be allowed to gain promotion? You also wouldn't have loanees from PL teams stopping your own prospects coming through. Is that not a good thing for the club?
Perhaps instead of abusing anyone who doesn't agree with you, you could explain why exactly it's a bad idea and son't give me all this 100 years of tradition crap because a lot has already changed over that period.

Way to miss the point completely.

I made reference to being in Chelsea B's shadow in League One as an example of how uncompetitive the league would become. Yes, we finished 15th this season, and I'm not about to sit here and say we're in the wrong position. However, it's still bloody competetive. We've beaten Wolves, held Brentford & Leyton Orient, put 5 past Peterborough etc, so it's not as though we're not getting a look in in games.

Regarding the fact that these B teams wouldn't be able to gain promotion - so fucking what? So after a year or so when the B teams are filled with stars of the future and they've all had the short time given to them to earn promotion from this "League 3", then up to League 2, and finally up to League 1, whereby during this time of serious uncompetitiveness the likes of Carlisle, Crewe, Tranmere, Gillingham et al have all been relegated because of these B teams, the rest of us who have managed to stay in League 1 now have to pretty much compete for 11th place to earn promotion, all because of this little law that doesn't allow the B teams to earn promotion to the Championship? It might be "numbers" to you, but regardless of whether finishing 11th guarantees you promotion and the title of "League 1 fake champions", it sounds fucking shit and makes a complete mockery of the "Football League".

Furthering that, given for example 11th place means you win promotion, there will still only be 24 teams in the league, so that means out of the 14 positions taken up by us normal folk (and not the B teams), there'd have to be 2 automatic promotion spots, 4 play off places and 4 relegation places, meaning mid table effectively consists of 4 positions - that is unless, of course, there's plans to lower the chances of getting out of the league, which makes it even fucking harder for us minions to reach the "promise land".

I want to be competing with teams at our level, like we have for decades, where competitiveness is still abundantly clear despite the Wolves/Sheff Utd's of this world, rather than watch us play the reserve sides of the Premiership, where in all likeliness these teams will have the next stars of the future in who will more than likely destroy teams like Oldham week on week. Now where would I, and the thousands of Carlisle, Crewe, Tranmere & Gillingham fans find the fun in that?

As for you "loanees stopping our prospects coming through" - this doesn't really happen now, so that's a pointless argument. Look at the youth stars Crewe have churned up over recent years that have gone on to reach the Championship and Premier League, all whilst at the same time loaning players themselves.

And what about those sides down in the Conference North & South, who are working hard to reach the football league and yet because there's now a plan to put Premier League reserve sides into a league inbetween League 2 & Conference Premier, they'll have their potential progress through the divisions stalled by at least a year. I say at least, because the Conference Premier sides who were knocking on the door of League Two, are now well behind terms of ability compared to, say Southampton B, and therefore that has a knock on effect on those lingering just behind those at the top of the Conference as it is now, a la Cambridge, Halifax & Gateshead.

And then after all the reasons I've given for my side of things, I still struggle to see how it would benefit the fat cats of the Premier League. You really think the likes of Pozo, Huws, Lopes et all would be better prepared for Premiership football in the future by playing against Dagenham & Redbridge etc, as opposed to playing in a well organised Premier League Reserve League, against the best of the best of each PL team? The only reason for this option not being taken is because Greg fucking Dyke cant seem to get it to work, so decides to fuck about with a well run Football League system instead.

Look at it this way - do you think Chelsea are more likely to put one of their B team players into their match day squad because they've played well against Dagenham & Redbridge than what they are now, given they loan them out to much, much better sides around the world and still dont get a sniff? Are they fuck.

Instead of meddling in our little world, how about implenting rules in the Premier League to improve the National Side, given that's where the problem is?

How about having to field a number of home grown players in your starting XI, or even in the match day squad? Further on, giving the Prem sides a target of 2020 before this comes into play would mean those sides would have to focus more on their youth set up with regards homegrown talent. They wouldn't have to stop recruiting non UK players, but there'd be much more focus on improving the English youngsters within their ranks.

How about limiting the number of non UK players you can send out on loan (since Chelsea have apprently got 25 across Europe), meaning our academies can focus more on British talent without completely wiping out the number of non UK youngsters on the books.

I believe across Spain, Germany & Italy there's around 28k qualified coaches. UEFA license courses over there, I believe, cost around £450. Here in England we have less than 3k qualified coaches, and we're being charged in excess of £2.5k to take one. How about looking at that, and trying to promote better coaching over here?

I could go, but I've already given enough reasons as it is.

The funny thing about this also is, IMO, the majority of supporters who like to watch/support/follow the English national team are supporters of lower league teams, whereas a lot of PL supporters are now so fixated on their own club's success, and fuel hatred for England players who play for their club rivals, that they're not really that arsed. Yet if this comes into fruition, all to apparently boost the English national set up, us lower league fans will go the other way. We're all for finding ways to improve our side, but not to the absolute destruction of OUR football league.
2rfpjbn.gif
 
Just a quick update on this:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/competitions/premier-league/10859378/Football-League-draws-up-plan-for-Premier-League-B-teams-to-enter-Johnstones-Paint-Trophy.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... rophy.html</a>

Football League draws up plan for Premier League 'B' teams to enter Johnstone's Paint Trophy

Lower-league clubs believe they have come up with a sensible alternative to Greg Dyke's controversial League Three plan

Premier League B teams to be invited into Johnstone’s Paint Trophy as alternative to Greg Dyke’s League Three plan

The Football League is to present an alternative proposal to Greg Dyke’s controversial League Three plan that would incorporate Premier League B teams in an expanded Johnstone’s Paint Trophy to include a group stage.

Dyke, the Football Association chairman, attends the Football League’s summer meeting in Faro next week when he will discuss his own commission’s plan to create a League Three with Premier League B teams and Conference clubs.

Many Football League clubs reacted angrily, fearing damage to the pyramid structure. A campaign and petition have been launched to “Say No To League Three”.

The Football League, and its chief executive, Shaun Harvey, understand the FA’s desire to improve the pathway for English talent, and are generally supportive of the commission’s objective, but will not countenance any plan that harms the pyramid. They have sent their alternative plan to the 72 clubs to consider before next week’s meeting.

The idea is for 16 B teams from clubs with Category One academies to join the 48 League Two and League One clubs in the Johnstone’s Paint Trophy on a trial basis for the next two seasons. The competition would start with 16 groups of four with one B team in each group. Each team would play each other only once, so the draw would decide whether home or away. The 16 winners would qualify for a straight knockout.

The attraction for the elite clubs is that their youngsters would be guaranteed a minimum of three competitive games up to eight if they reached the Wembley final.

The League’s proposal includes the stipulation that B teams would have to play at their club’s home stadium with gate receipts going into a central pot to be divided by the 48 lower-league clubs.

“At their summer meeting, clubs will discuss the Football League’s contribution to the England team and how we can enhance our already extensive contribution to the development of young players,’’ Harvey said.

“While the session was planned well before the findings of the FA chairman’s England Commission were made public, it does now give clubs the opportunity to have their say on these matters.

“It remains our view that while the objectives of the commission are laudable, the burden it places on our clubs should not be disproportionate or unreasonable.

"With this in mind, clubs will consider the merits or otherwise of inviting a number of B teams to participate in the Johnstone’s Paint Trophy as a means for improving elite player development while also improving the finances of League One and League Two clubs.”

To allay concerns over the financial implications of a poorly-attended final, Harvey’s organisation will seek assurances from the FA that it would underwrite the final in tune with a 10-year average of gate receipts. A crowd of 35,663 watched Peterborough United beat Chesterfield to win the Trophy on March 30.

There is, of course, the possibility that a Premier League B team could attract a huge following to Wembley which would increase revenue to the lower leagues. Broadcasters would also relish the opportunity of showing aspiring Premier League stars from the start of the competition.

Given the disparity in income at the top of the game and lower down the pyramid, the Football League would ask the Premier League to increase grant funding to clubs’ youth-development programmes.

The Football League is adamant that the B teams going into the Johnstone’s Paint Trophy must be mainly stocked with young English players otherwise the remit of Dyke’s commission would not be being fulfilled.

The Premier League itself has a plan for an Under-23 League, being contested outside the pyramid, but which could now also be involved in the Johnstone’s Paint Trophy, giving emerging players more competitive experience.

The Football League’s plan seems a measured, intelligent response to Dyke’s B-team concept which has threatened to exacerbate the divide between FA, Football League and Premier League.
 
Falastur said:
Just a quick update on this:

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/competitions/premier-league/10859378/Football-League-draws-up-plan-for-Premier-League-B-teams-to-enter-Johnstones-Paint-Trophy.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... rophy.html</a>

Football League draws up plan for Premier League 'B' teams to enter Johnstone's Paint Trophy

Lower-league clubs believe they have come up with a sensible alternative to Greg Dyke's controversial League Three plan

Premier League B teams to be invited into Johnstone’s Paint Trophy as alternative to Greg Dyke’s League Three plan

The Football League is to present an alternative proposal to Greg Dyke’s controversial League Three plan that would incorporate Premier League B teams in an expanded Johnstone’s Paint Trophy to include a group stage.

Dyke, the Football Association chairman, attends the Football League’s summer meeting in Faro next week when he will discuss his own commission’s plan to create a League Three with Premier League B teams and Conference clubs.

Many Football League clubs reacted angrily, fearing damage to the pyramid structure. A campaign and petition have been launched to “Say No To League Three”.

The Football League, and its chief executive, Shaun Harvey, understand the FA’s desire to improve the pathway for English talent, and are generally supportive of the commission’s objective, but will not countenance any plan that harms the pyramid. They have sent their alternative plan to the 72 clubs to consider before next week’s meeting.

The idea is for 16 B teams from clubs with Category One academies to join the 48 League Two and League One clubs in the Johnstone’s Paint Trophy on a trial basis for the next two seasons. The competition would start with 16 groups of four with one B team in each group. Each team would play each other only once, so the draw would decide whether home or away. The 16 winners would qualify for a straight knockout.

The attraction for the elite clubs is that their youngsters would be guaranteed a minimum of three competitive games up to eight if they reached the Wembley final.

The League’s proposal includes the stipulation that B teams would have to play at their club’s home stadium with gate receipts going into a central pot to be divided by the 48 lower-league clubs.

“At their summer meeting, clubs will discuss the Football League’s contribution to the England team and how we can enhance our already extensive contribution to the development of young players,’’ Harvey said.

“While the session was planned well before the findings of the FA chairman’s England Commission were made public, it does now give clubs the opportunity to have their say on these matters.

“It remains our view that while the objectives of the commission are laudable, the burden it places on our clubs should not be disproportionate or unreasonable.

"With this in mind, clubs will consider the merits or otherwise of inviting a number of B teams to participate in the Johnstone’s Paint Trophy as a means for improving elite player development while also improving the finances of League One and League Two clubs.”

To allay concerns over the financial implications of a poorly-attended final, Harvey’s organisation will seek assurances from the FA that it would underwrite the final in tune with a 10-year average of gate receipts. A crowd of 35,663 watched Peterborough United beat Chesterfield to win the Trophy on March 30.

There is, of course, the possibility that a Premier League B team could attract a huge following to Wembley which would increase revenue to the lower leagues. Broadcasters would also relish the opportunity of showing aspiring Premier League stars from the start of the competition.

Given the disparity in income at the top of the game and lower down the pyramid, the Football League would ask the Premier League to increase grant funding to clubs’ youth-development programmes.

The Football League is adamant that the B teams going into the Johnstone’s Paint Trophy must be mainly stocked with young English players otherwise the remit of Dyke’s commission would not be being fulfilled.

The Premier League itself has a plan for an Under-23 League, being contested outside the pyramid, but which could now also be involved in the Johnstone’s Paint Trophy, giving emerging players more competitive experience.

The Football League’s plan seems a measured, intelligent response to Dyke’s B-team concept which has threatened to exacerbate the divide between FA, Football League and Premier League.

Good idea, maintains the U21 league but allows for prem youngsters to be tested at that level whilst playing the way their parent club wants and still at that level, whilst preserving the league structure.
 
taconinja said:
Three whole matches? Exciting.

tell me the system with Lallana, Barkley, Shaw, Ward-Prowse, Sterling, Sturridge, Stones, Chambers, Hart, Clyne, Jones (yes the rags spoilt him), Oxlade-Chamberlain and in British terms Bale, Ramsey etc. isn't working, good british players with good coaching make it, improve the coaching, improve the players, then we don't need silly B teams.
 
JoeMercer'sWay said:
taconinja said:
Three whole matches? Exciting.

tell me the system with Lallana, Barkley, Shaw, Ward-Prowse, Sterling, Sturridge, Stones, Chambers, Hart, Clyne, Jones (yes the rags spoilt him), Oxlade-Chamberlain and in British terms Bale, Ramsey etc. isn't working, good british players with good coaching make it, improve the coaching, improve the players, then we don't need silly B teams.
I think you have some interesting talent which I've yet to see translate to international success.
 
taconinja said:
JoeMercer'sWay said:
taconinja said:
Three whole matches? Exciting.

tell me the system with Lallana, Barkley, Shaw, Ward-Prowse, Sterling, Sturridge, Stones, Chambers, Hart, Clyne, Jones (yes the rags spoilt him), Oxlade-Chamberlain and in British terms Bale, Ramsey etc. isn't working, good british players with good coaching make it, improve the coaching, improve the players, then we don't need silly B teams.
I think you have some interesting talent which I've yet to see translate to international success.

it's more than we had the generation previous, so why not let this system of "if English players are good enough they'll come through" develop with continually improved coaching standards rather than wrecking our football pyramid for a gamble that has no real proof that it will pay off, and in fact may ruin things.
 
JoeMercer'sWay said:
taconinja said:
Three whole matches? Exciting.

tell me the system with Lallana, Barkley, Shaw, Ward-Prowse, Sterling, Sturridge, Stones, Chambers, Hart, Clyne, Jones (yes the rags spoilt him), Oxlade-Chamberlain and in British terms Bale, Ramsey etc. isn't working, good british players with good coaching make it, improve the coaching, improve the players, then we don't need silly B teams.
Add to that improve coaching at younger levels, and make sure that football doesn't lose the very talented kids at 11, 12, 13 because they don't get picked up by a league club, ie the FA needs to improve its coaching structure outside of league clubs, at junior level, far too many never get beyond their junior teams, school teams, and that is because they have no chance of being picked up, as the clubs never see them.
 
Even this is a bobbins idea, IMO.

Even us little league 1 & 2 teams send out weakened sides in the JPT as we're only required to field six regular first-teamers, based on overall appearances or previous and subsequent games.

Just leave our leagues alone, please.
 
The only way to fix the problem is for the FA to get off their fat arses and spend money to improve grass roots. You've got kids getting changed in storage containers and using old equipment with barely any coaches because it's so ridiculously expensive to get badges. As usual, the FA want to try and fix the problem by doing as little as possible themselves.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.