City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

[BlueRockape]

Maybe the MAFFIA made him an offer he could not refuse ?

 

[SilverFox2]

I look forward to the day that Etihad becomes the main sponsor of the Champions League. That would cause more than a few UEFA worms to turn.

Not a bad shout that.
I suppose in a way we already have that trend albeit in reverse with our relationship with Nissan who I think are already a sponsor for UEFA ?

Ignoring the politics, business will always try to spend its marketing budget in a way that gives it maximum exposure to its perceived customers.
The way that Sky and BT have upped the stakes because of the rewards they expect from TV rights should make all sponsors more than ready to tap into that TV audience.
As Mr K. said a few months ago the emphasis is now on commercial matters and what a time to develop that strategy.

I am eager to see what ADUG's commercial team can achieve in this fertile environment.

 

[Centurions]

Yet another fine piece of journalism from who I consider to be the most "enlightened" scribe in... Fleet Street (as was), namely Martin Samuel. I appreciate the tabloid bashes will want to have a moan, especially as it's from shhhhh.....The Daily Mail

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-3088434/I-told-Michel-Platini-destroying-football-finally-seen-it.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... en-it.html</a>

Here is today’s question. Why is it that whatever is good for the two Milan clubs also happens to be what is best for football, according to UEFA? Ever wondered that? Whatever the Milan clubs want, they get. When they wanted FFP, in it came; now they want more financial freedom, they get that, too.
Don’t be mistaken. The relaxation of UEFA’s wrecking ball....

8 pages too late I'm afraid bud, although it is a very good article. And brave considering all the opposition fans will be in blinkered denial.

 

[VOOMER]

The reference to Gil, if un challenged, is clearly fact and Gill should be removed.

 

[jrb]

PL prize money.(couldn't fit the whole table on the screen) The link to the website explains how they've worked it out, rightly or wrongly.

[bigimg]http://i.imgur.com/mZZhds1.jpg[/bigimg]

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.totalsportek.com/football/premier-league-prize-money-table-2015/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.totalsportek.com/football/pr ... able-2015/</a>

 

[@BluePhil8]

PL prize money.(couldn't fit the whole table on the screen) The link to the website explains how they've worked it out, rightly or wrongly.

[bigimg]http://i.imgur.com/mZZhds1.jpg[/bigimg]

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.totalsportek.com/football/premier-league-prize-money-table-2015/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.totalsportek.com/football/pr ... able-2015/</a>

That can't be right.

They have made the mistake of having City receive more in television money than any other club.

According to Redcafe and Rawk no one in their right mind would sponsor City, except Arab friends of our owner. So how can it be that we are getting more TV money than they are?

 

[jrb]

£2mill more than the Rags.(give or take) Gill and Woodward won't be happy with that.

 

[mancity dan]

Similar to last year. When we won the league second got more money overall.

We have earnt more overall than Chelsea due to televised games.

 

[swifty]

The robbing bastards, we should be on £97.3m.

 

[Dribble]

***SSN BREAKING NEWS***

SSN has been told by a top lawyer the reason FFP is being relaxed is because the EU have told them many parts of it are unenforceable in European law!!!