Machiavelli
Well-Known Member
No they were proposed initially to prevent clubs being burdened with debt.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)
- Thread starter Marvin
- Start date
But somehow debt was never part of the rules that came into force. I wonder why that could've happened.No they were proposed initially to prevent clubs being burdened with debt.
BlueAnorak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 27,844
The idea was to stop clubs going bust due to debt - but then Utd, Barca, Real and Bayern hijacked it. And debt was ignored.No they were proposed initially to prevent clubs being burdened with debt.
Machiavelli
Well-Known Member
But somehow debt was never part of the rules that came into force. I wonder why that could've happened.
Can someone tell @LFC-Fans that. I thought they were the most knowledgeable fans in world football? The ones who post on here haven’t got a clue. Ignorant, ill informed KFA’s.The idea was to stop clubs going bust due to debt - but then Utd, Barca, Real and Bayern hijacked it. And debt was ignored.
Maybe it's just me but as the UEFA CL is by invite I'd gladly tell them to shove the invite up their arses. Concentrate on winning the domestic treble every season.
Unfortunately top players want to play in the corrupt competition so it's not really a goer.
Unfortunately top players want to play in the corrupt competition so it's not really a goer.
BlueAnorak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 27,844
LFC are worse hit than we are at the moment. They couldn't have signed VVD without selling Coutinho.Well they don’t affect us the most. They were invented to try that but it didn’t happen, have you seen how strong we and PSG have become? What a stupid ill informed assumption. Lots of other clubs are struggling with FFP and the inability to gain significant investment due to the silly restrictions invented to try and stop the “Arab owned” clubs who dicks can’t separate due to the owners ethnicity.
I
I
IH8MUFC
Guest
Just put a salary cap in place that is equal for every single club. It's really not that hard.
Machiavelli
Well-Known Member
Indeed, if only they could find a loophole to exploit. FFP made us stronger, smarter and more strategic than the dickheads would’ve ever imagined possible.LC are worse hit than we are at the moment. They couldn't have signed VVD without selling Coutinho.
Machiavelli
Well-Known Member
It’s not, and has never been about “Fair Play”. It’s about maintaining the old status quo.Just put a salary cap in place that is equal for every single club. It's really not that hard.
On the 25 players surely that gives clubs with b teams such as Barca a big advantage.
The CFG is the only danger we face but any new rules would be difficult to write.
This 100 million may reduce transfer fees, but will increase wages, agent fees.
What happens when you get a 80 million pound player for 35, you spend the rest in wages and fees.
There is also more to a transfer then the fee. Say we sold a 20 million pound player for 25 million on the condition we paid all the fees and a larger then normal loyalty bonus to the player so he would accept a lower wage with his new club. As opposed to accepting a lower fee of 15 million, so the new club can pay more in salaries.
The CFG is the only danger we face but any new rules would be difficult to write.
This 100 million may reduce transfer fees, but will increase wages, agent fees.
What happens when you get a 80 million pound player for 35, you spend the rest in wages and fees.
There is also more to a transfer then the fee. Say we sold a 20 million pound player for 25 million on the condition we paid all the fees and a larger then normal loyalty bonus to the player so he would accept a lower wage with his new club. As opposed to accepting a lower fee of 15 million, so the new club can pay more in salaries.