Bill Walker
Well-Known Member
Sanchez earns more than Saudi
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)
- Thread starter Marvin
- Start date
toffee balls
Well-Known Member
Oh the fuckin irony.
I remember watching all the private planes flying in for the all Italian ECL final in our very own city not so long ago.
Not out fault your football is on it’s arse.
I remember watching all the private planes flying in for the all Italian ECL final in our very own city not so long ago.
Not out fault your football is on it’s arse.
PannickAtTheDisco
Well-Known Member
I don't understand his statement.
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
Seems like they're bringing forward FFP assessments for anyone spending over 100m in a season to ensure they're not breaching the existing regs (as PSG may have done this season) instead of introducing a hard cap on spend.I don't understand his statement.
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 14,212
So as long as you can afford more than £100m it isn't an issue, other than they'll want to look at your books sooner than they would have?Seems like they're bringing forward FFP assessments for anyone spending over 100m in a season to ensure they're not breaching the existing regs (as PSG may have done this season) instead of introducing a hard cap on spend.
squirtyflower
Well-Known Member
It means the likes of corrupt ****s like Gill can be constantly monitoring the accounts of his competitors, seems a totally fair business practiceSo as long as you can afford more than £100m it isn't an issue, other than they'll want to look at your books sooner than they would have?
MillionMilesAway
Well-Known Member
That's how I read it.
aguero93:20
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2013
- Messages
- 90,256
- Location
- Hunting Cats.
- Team supported
- Some gobshites in day-glo green and black.
It's a bit nonsensical really, if they're doing that, they'll essentially be examining a club on 2 years of accounts and a budget for the 3rd year, budgets are nothing more than guesswork and wishful thinking. You can't do that and apply a concrete number for loss limits. If City think they're going to fail by half a million on the budget they'll revise the budget by a couple of million, same goes for any other club.So as long as you can afford more than £100m it isn't an issue, other than they'll want to look at your books sooner than they would have?
It means the likes of corrupt ****s like Gill can be constantly monitoring the accounts of his competitors, seems a totally fair business practice
Not only monitoring but reporting back to his (cough) friends about how certain clubs (cough) City get their money and where they get it from. Bent is the word I am thinking of at the moment.
PannickAtTheDisco
Well-Known Member
Not only monitoring but reporting back to his (cough) friends about how certain clubs (cough) City get their money and where they get it from. Bent is the word I am thinking of at the moment.
anyone can read our accounts, it's hardly privileged knowledge.