City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

[M18CTID]

If you google man city one of the search result is “why is man city banned “?
To me this is a massive issue coz this stain will remain unless we take them to court for defamation.

Don't google it then

 

[Chi-town blues]

Don't google it then

hahahha good one but i do countless times a day and this result has been the same .

 

[Centurions]

If you google man city one of the search result is “why is man city banned “?
To me this is a massive issue coz this stain will remain unless we take them to court for defamation.

You are @King KdB of Belgium and I claim my £5

;)

 

[dubblue]

Does Hollywood need regulation? Is it an issue if The Rock gets $40m for a (s)hit movie that makes a profit?

Exactly,salary caps is a ridiculous idea.

 

[aguero93:20]

Again I'm assuming here but this won't affect existing contracts. With the original FFP contracts predating the start date were excluded if I recall correctly.

It'll have to affect existing contracts if they directly target salary, otherwise its discriminatory.

 

[Ric]

city should drag these cunts to court for defamation and recoup for every penny spend regarding ffp with interest.
Also all fines should be refunded with interest .

Hahahahaha wouldn’t go that far,but would be interesting if it was completely scraped would we have any possibility of redress as in monies claimed back as in the fines we paid ..

Ha, on what grounds?!

 

[KS55]

Let's face it, football does need regulation in terms of salaries and agents. It is ridiculous.

Just regulate debt then you catch everything. (Plus maybe sources of income, but not amounts). If you regulate wages for example you are interfering with the business model. Then you will find you are forced bit by bit to regulate the P and L line by line. If you want to ensure sustainability, look after the balance sheet.

 

[Bald fraud]

They will try and attack the CFG business model.

I’ve always wonder why they haven’t done this already. It would be so easy for them to bring in a rule where an owner couldn’t own several teams in different countries. Possibly the only reason they haven’t is that some of the other big boys plan on copying it

 

[KS55]

The irony is that we wont bid for Haarland until his release clause come in. His price and wage demands will be beyond our policy. And Messi will piss ppl in the dressing room off.

 

[Ric]

I’ve always wonder why they haven’t done this already. It would be so easy for them to bring in a rule where an owner couldn’t own several teams in different countries. Possibly the only reason they haven’t is that some of the other big boys plan on copying it

Yeah, that would seem the most obvious way to hinder us although I'm not sure it'd have that huge an impact now anyway. City would still be able to thrive without the other clubs in the CFG.