City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

Double like on the Garry Cook bit.

What were Everton saying/asking for in their emails (if you can share?)?. God I imagine they’re kicking themselves.
Probably a bit of tax-free hard cash in hand, nudge nudge wink wink don't involve the taxman or the dole office :)
 
Double like on the Garry Cook bit.

What were Everton saying/asking for in their emails (if you can share?)?. God I imagine they’re kicking themselves.
They were being asked to sign non-disclosure agreements, as a condition of ADUG undertaking due diligence. They were stalling and making alternative suggestions. It was made clear to them by Amanda Staveley that these things were non-negotiable and she was getting increasingly impatient with them. I remember seeing an email where she said something like "What do these people not understand? They either do it our way or not at all. They are so unprofessional".

Those weren't the exact words but that was the tone.
 
but his wealth is the reason we could outspend everyone if spending was unrestricted, this is hypothetically speaking of course. I don't think it's a good idea to allow that.
No matter how much money you have, it's no guarantee of signing the best players
We tried signing Kaka and failed
When spending was unrestricted, Chelsea tried buying everyone with some success but they weren't dominating everything
 
No matter how much money you have, it's no guarantee of signing the best players
We tried signing Kaka and failed
When spending was unrestricted, Chelsea tried buying everyone with some success but they weren't dominating everything
Chelsea were extremely dominant for a while until we came along


Chelsea couldn't compete financially with us and now we are dominant. If City didn't get money there is no reason to think Chelsea wouldn't have been getting our players and continuing the domination.

Nobody can compete financially with City in a free market. Maybe PSG
 
Chelsea were extremely dominant for a while until we came along


Chelsea couldn't compete financially with us and now we are dominant. If City didn't get money there is no reason to think Chelsea wouldn't have been getting our players and continuing the domination.

United were more successful than Chelsea during that period. Chelsea won back to back titles but United followed it up with three in a row + a CL.
 
United were more successful than Chelsea during that period. Chelsea won back to back titles but United followed it up with three in a row + a CL.
it says it right there - Chelsea won more trophies than anyone. It's in an article with a graph. I don't know how much more I can do for you fella
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.