Probably a bit of tax-free hard cash in hand, nudge nudge wink wink don't involve the taxman or the dole office :)Double like on the Garry Cook bit.
What were Everton saying/asking for in their emails (if you can share?)?. God I imagine they’re kicking themselves.
They were being asked to sign non-disclosure agreements, as a condition of ADUG undertaking due diligence. They were stalling and making alternative suggestions. It was made clear to them by Amanda Staveley that these things were non-negotiable and she was getting increasingly impatient with them. I remember seeing an email where she said something like "What do these people not understand? They either do it our way or not at all. They are so unprofessional".Double like on the Garry Cook bit.
What were Everton saying/asking for in their emails (if you can share?)?. God I imagine they’re kicking themselves.
No matter how much money you have, it's no guarantee of signing the best playersbut his wealth is the reason we could outspend everyone if spending was unrestricted, this is hypothetically speaking of course. I don't think it's a good idea to allow that.
Chelsea were extremely dominant for a while until we came alongNo matter how much money you have, it's no guarantee of signing the best players
We tried signing Kaka and failed
When spending was unrestricted, Chelsea tried buying everyone with some success but they weren't dominating everything
Rags had won 4 of the last 5 titles when we won our first.Chelsea were extremely dominant for a while until we came along
Chelsea dominate trophy count in Abramovich era
Frank Lampard takes charge of Chelsea looking to continue their dominant trophy record under Roman Abramovich’s ownership.www.independent.ie
Chelsea were extremely dominant for a while until we came along
Chelsea dominate trophy count in Abramovich era
Frank Lampard takes charge of Chelsea looking to continue their dominant trophy record under Roman Abramovich’s ownership.www.independent.ie
Chelsea couldn't compete financially with us and now we are dominant. If City didn't get money there is no reason to think Chelsea wouldn't have been getting our players and continuing the domination.
Chelsea won more than United in that timeframe, for a period of time they were utterly dominant, in Mourinho(spit) first spell. Roman went a bit do-lally for a while then. Chelsea is his toy.Rags had won 4 of the last 5 titles when we won our first.
They won 3.Chelsea won more than United in that timeframe, for a period of time they were utterly dominant, in Mourinho(spit) first spell. Roman went a bit do-lally for a while then. Chelsea is his toy.
it says it right there - Chelsea won more trophies than anyone. It's in an article with a graph. I don't know how much more I can do for you fellaUnited were more successful than Chelsea during that period. Chelsea won back to back titles but United followed it up with three in a row + a CL.