bluemanchester
Well-Known Member
My understanding of it was that the hearing started at 9.30 and was over before 10 once the chairman and the panel had stopped pissing themselves laughing at the evidence presented by UEFA and gathered for them by employees and supporters of the hateful eight, four of which you could call the gullible 4. The rest of the hearing was only about going round in circles so that the public would think there was really some serious case being heard as the preceding publicity from the press had led the public to believe, when in reality there was nothing, absolutely nothing, they could find City guilty about other than not cooperating. And in that instance who could blame City for not cooperating with a bunch of crooks led by our American cousins. Anyway thats my view someone elses view may be different;-)My memory isn't what it was but am I right in thinking that City's "bad" first day at CAS was because virtually any documents UEFA wished to present were found to be admissible by the court, contrary to City's claims, but that, in fact, this served only to show that they had no evidence at all to support their charges and that they could not argue this was because they were not allowed to present their case?
Last edited: