Indeed. If it goes through, it’s open season. If it doesn’t , it’s legal season.
From Trafford rangers forum:
‘Even on Bluemoon they recognise this as dodgy, and a test of the FFP rules. Like they say, if it's allowed, it's open season. If it's not allowed, it's legal season.’
fame for moi at last.
can’t say I said it was ‘dodgy’, nor was Pablo. Unless she/he recognized we were insinuating the artificial cartel requested FFP is ‘dodgy’, but I guess that went straight through the air gap between their ears.
It’s certainly a ‘test’ , a test of whether the cartel clubs want to continue their charade of ‘waaahh stop them all, we must support the red shirts through artificial and blatantly biased means’
edit: and to whomever you are, please explain how any club can grow (or regrow) without external investment. You know, like united (at least twice) Liverpool (from the very start and littlewoods) Arsenal (from the start and fiszman)? Or is that ‘historic’ investment and so is irrelevant to your thoughts? Either way it’s immaterial, City owner investment ended 8 years ago, we took a ‘pinch’ fine for uefa who changed the ffp rules after we’d submitted our accounts, and since then it’s been smear after cartel smear. All the way up to CAS , who declared they was no case to answer to, just a made up conjoined hacked emails (6 out of allegedly millions), and the pushing of the cartel for blood. Look to your own owners - fleecing the sheep for 100s of millions and you all go siuuuu.
/rant off
wam.ae
