It wont because the bigger footballing story now is the open bias by sections of the footballing industry towards Man Utd and Liverpool. It's really obvious. Another investigation of Manchester City? Yawn. Try looking once in a while elsewhere.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)
- Thread starter Marvin
- Start date
It wont because the bigger footballing story now is the open bias by sections of the footballing industry towards Man Utd and Liverpool. It's really obvious. Another investigation of Manchester City? Yawn. Try looking once in a while elsewhere.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 59,978
Not in name.He is still our owner.
Yes in name.Not in name.
The only thing that has changed is we're owned by Newton investments (Owned by Mansour) as opposed to being owned by ADUG (owned by Mansour).
Massive revelation:
The best source of sponsorships is your friends, colleagues and business partners. Fuck me, never realised that.
The Athletic and others should be aware that sponsorship is about future exposure not historical success.
The best source of sponsorships is your friends, colleagues and business partners. Fuck me, never realised that.
The Athletic and others should be aware that sponsorship is about future exposure not historical success.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 59,978
Thanks omni-correspondent.Yes in name.
The only thing that has changed is we're owned by Newton investments (Owned by Mansour) as opposed to being owned by ADUG (owned by Mansour).
The loose use of "we" is confusing. Manchester City is wholly owned by CFG.Yes in name.
The only thing that has changed is we're owned by Newton investments (Owned by Mansour) as opposed to being owned by ADUG (owned by Mansour).
CFG is owned (77%) by Newton, aka Mansour.
meltonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 May 2013
- Messages
- 6,993
Not in name.
As much as he ever has been he is. It’s just Newton rather than ADUG.
Alan Harper's Tash
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 59,978
Thanks, the omni-correspondent has already put me right.As much as he ever has been he is. It’s just Newton rather than ADUG.
What do you expect from a bitter rag like Crafton?That Crafton article is pretty poorly written, full of insinuations, ignorance and innuendo. Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury. Signifying nothing.
It’s carrion for the old money brigade and is a poor indictment of the Athletic’s declining journalistic standards.
meltonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 14 May 2013
- Messages
- 6,993
Thanks, the omni-correspondent has already put me right.
Just saw, sorry, hadn’t read through!