City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

Re: City & FFP (continued)

big blueballs said:
aguero93:20 said:
Bottomless_Sailor said:
"UEFA's solution not the answer. System is inadequate and illegal under European law" - Jean Louis-Dupont (Bosman lawyer) on legality of FFP
Short, snappy and entirely true. IAI instead of FFP?
Could it be that maybe UEFA wants FFP challenged in court, which may break the cartel that is G14 and stop the tail wagging the dog so to speak?
I'd say UEFA are like any other organisation and have factions that favour the G14 and factions that don't. I'd love to know what Deloittes think of FFP as they were consulted about it beforehand.
Tbh the illegal parts of FFP seem to have been put in sure to the influence of the G14 so they could be sharpening the axe for their own necks sure to greed and stupidity, it's one way to read Platini's comments to Samuel.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

I see that Jean-Louis Dupont gave an interview in today's Le Parisien (nice timing) when he again outlines why FFP is illegal. I haven't seen the original article as it's behind a paywall.

Took this from Goal.



The Belgian, who represented Jean-Marc Bosman in a landmark case in 1995, insists that the rules only serve to block the rise of new powers on the continent

Lawyer Jean-Louis Dupont has claimed that Uefa's Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations are against the law and feels European football's governing body will not achieve their objectives with the current rules.

The Belgian, who made a name for himself when defending Jean-Marc Bosman's right in what eventually led to the Bosman ruling in 1995, decided to challenge FFP at the European Commission back in May 2013 and he remains adamant that Uefa's plans don't comply with European law.

"The premise that you shouldn't spend more than you earn is a good idea, but Uefa's solution is not the answer. The public will love it, but you'd need an economic, political and legal analysis to explain why it's wrong. The system is inadequate and illegal under European law," Dupont told Le Parisien.

"The rules create a number of restrictions, like limiting investments and limiting transfers. Clubs will employ fewer players and will pay lower wages. It also affects the right of free movement of capital, workers and providing services.

"Uefa says football shouldn't be a contest of money, buy you can only laugh when you look at the teams that dominate the Champions League. These are the richest teams out there.

"Forcing clubs to balance their finances is interesting, but it doesn't achieve Uefa's purported objectives. This effectively forbids clubs to invest and blocks the development process. The rich clubs will continue to dominate. A rich investor can no longer take an average club and build it into a European force."

Uefa confirmed last week that nine clubs are to be investigated further over a possible failure to comply with Financial Fair Play guidelines, with Paris Saint-Germain and Manchester City believed to be among the aforementioned teams.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

Henkeman said:
aguero93:20 said:
chicagoblues said:
He got mouthful already.
I love dragging him into stuff on twitter, he's not very good at defending his idiotic statements in public.

I'm in two minds whether to follow him or not. He's such a clueless idiot, I don't want to give him the extra number, but it's so funny watching him being ripped apart.
Don't follow him, but usually someone I do follow retweets anything city-related so I wouldn't bother.

Funny that my auto-spell changed ' retweet' to idiot.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

Murph said:
I see that Jean-Louis Dupont gave an interview in today's Le Parisien (nice timing) when he again outlines why FFP is illegal. I haven't seen the original article as it's behind a paywall.

Took this from Goal.



The Belgian, who represented Jean-Marc Bosman in a landmark case in 1995, insists that the rules only serve to block the rise of new powers on the continent

Lawyer Jean-Louis Dupont has claimed that Uefa's Financial Fair Play (FFP) regulations are against the law and feels European football's governing body will not achieve their objectives with the current rules.

The Belgian, who made a name for himself when defending Jean-Marc Bosman's right in what eventually led to the Bosman ruling in 1995, decided to challenge FFP at the European Commission back in May 2013 and he remains adamant that Uefa's plans don't comply with European law.

"The premise that you shouldn't spend more than you earn is a good idea, but Uefa's solution is not the answer. The public will love it, but you'd need an economic, political and legal analysis to explain why it's wrong. The system is inadequate and illegal under European law," Dupont told Le Parisien.

"The rules create a number of restrictions, like limiting investments and limiting transfers. Clubs will employ fewer players and will pay lower wages. It also affects the right of free movement of capital, workers and providing services.

"Uefa says football shouldn't be a contest of money, buy you can only laugh when you look at the teams that dominate the Champions League. These are the richest teams out there.

"Forcing clubs to balance their finances is interesting, but it doesn't achieve Uefa's purported objectives. This effectively forbids clubs to invest and blocks the development process. The rich clubs will continue to dominate. A rich investor can no longer take an average club and build it into a European force."

Uefa confirmed last week that nine clubs are to be investigated further over a possible failure to comply with Financial Fair Play guidelines, with Paris Saint-Germain and Manchester City believed to be among the aforementioned teams.

Re the highlighted bit..

Of course its about money,thats why 4 clubs from each league are invited to play in the 'champions league' when in fact only 1 club are in fact champions.
They want to ensure as is far as possible that all the cartel clubs get into the competition to generate the huge tv and sponsor revenues that keep the UEFA fatcats fed and watered.

Do they really think we are thick or sommat??

As stated if FFP fails it will open the floodgates for huge investment from oil money which will threaten the salad days of the current football Aristocrats..


The peasants are revolting and the guillotines are being sharpened..and public enemy number 1 is a frenchman.. how apt..
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

Mr Dupont you are going to make a lot of city fans very happy. Take Platini and his cohorts to the fucking cleaners. While you are at it could you send Mr Wenger a summary as well.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

Always enjoy the read,this thread will be very interesting over the next few weeks,I do wonder who's paying this lawyer for his services??????
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

mannycity said:
Always enjoy the read,this thread will be very interesting over the next few weeks,I do wonder who's paying this lawyer for his services??????
Oh I'd imagine theres some bottomless pockets out there with an interest in all this ;)
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

mannycity said:
Always enjoy the read,this thread will be very interesting over the next few weeks,I do wonder who's paying this lawyer for his services??????
Quite possibly the same person who paid for a little dossier to be delivered to Mike Riley when we started getting the shitty end of the stick from his referees in 2011/12.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

Prestwich_Blue said:
mannycity said:
Always enjoy the read,this thread will be very interesting over the next few weeks,I do wonder who's paying this lawyer for his services??????
Quite possibly the same person who paid for a little dossier to be delivered to Mike Riley when we started getting the shitty end of the stick from his referees in 2011/12.

kcibf5.gif
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

Prestwich_Blue said:
mannycity said:
Always enjoy the read,this thread will be very interesting over the next few weeks,I do wonder who's paying this lawyer for his services??????
Quite possibly the same person who paid for a little dossier to be delivered to Mike Riley when we started getting the shitty end of the stick from his referees in 2011/12.

so why have the Dippers got Clattenburg then?

No good if we haven't still got the ammo 2 years later when we need it again.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.