Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
Re: City & FFP (continued)
You know these are both great points. I've thought for a long while that this isn't really a battle that UEFA wanted, well not this way. It hadn't occurred to me that UEFA might have actually gone along with it in order to distance themselves from it if it once it was challenged. The ECA run UEFA. Lets hope the ECJ take no notice of the EC.
There's a lot of abbreviations there!
aguero93:20 said:I'd say UEFA are like any other organisation and have factions that favour the G14 and factions that don't. I'd love to know what Deloittes think of FFP as they were consulted about it beforehand.big blueballs said:Could it be that maybe UEFA wants FFP challenged in court, which may break the cartel that is G14 and stop the tail wagging the dog so to speak?aguero93:20 said:Short, snappy and entirely true. IAI instead of FFP?
Tbh the illegal parts of FFP seem to have been put in sure to the influence of the G14 so they could be sharpening the axe for their own necks sure to greed and stupidity, it's one way to read Platini's comments to Samuel.
You know these are both great points. I've thought for a long while that this isn't really a battle that UEFA wanted, well not this way. It hadn't occurred to me that UEFA might have actually gone along with it in order to distance themselves from it if it once it was challenged. The ECA run UEFA. Lets hope the ECJ take no notice of the EC.
There's a lot of abbreviations there!