City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

Re: City & FFP (continued)

EL APACHE TEVEZ said:
Dynamo11 said:
Would I be the only one who wouldn't give a shit if we were banned from Europe for a season? It's not ideal but the UCL isn't exactly brimming with quality matches and it's got corruption riddled through to its very core. I know I probably wouldn't miss it, although no doubt the owners will, we have all been fooled (and the MANY sponsors) into thinking it is the absolute dog's bollocks in regards to Football Tournaments. That is the absolute opposite of what it is, when was the last time there was an absolute classic match that wasn't already an established derby? I've seen better football overall watching mid-table BPL teams duke it out. But of course football can go hang when the money coming in is just so big, especially from Russian gas and oil magnates, oh what's that you say? Big spending Chelsea were in the semi-finals again? What a coincidence.

I'd rather win the league ten times over than win the UCL just once, I honestly mean that.
+ 1

+ 2
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

kramer said:
Manchester_lalala said:
There's an article on the daily mail from an financial expert saying we've failed it due to our wage bill in 10/11 season. That gets wiped out next year but will city accept the fine as they know we will pass it from next season onwards? After all this 50m could be completely made up and we've got a fine much less than is reported.

That "financial expert" is Ed Thompson who is not an expert, been chewed up and spat out on here by Prestwich Blue and others. He is a self-appointed expert on FfP runs a website He trawls for info and then later repeats rumour and opinion of others as though it is fact


He was caught out yesterday. All he was doing was picking bits out of a Telegraph and Guardian article. Stuck them together and tried to claim it as his own article.

As usual he said "a source close to the process".

Even Hayward and Holt were disagreeing with him re FFP.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

gordondaviesmoustache said:
Dynamo11 said:
Would I be the only one who wouldn't give a shit if we were banned from Europe for a season?
I've come to quite enjoy imbibing the rich cultural canvas that visiting some of Europe's leading cities provides, by finding the biggest square and drinking there for two consecutive days.
You will have plenty of money for city square then ; )
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

EL APACHE TEVEZ said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
Dynamo11 said:
Would I be the only one who wouldn't give a shit if we were banned from Europe for a season?
I've come to quite enjoy imbibing the rich cultural canvas that visiting some of Europe's leading cities provides, by finding the biggest square and drinking there for two consecutive days.
You will have plenty of money for city square then ; )

Theres always St Ann's Square.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

Selbyblue said:
kramer said:
Manchester_lalala said:
There's an article on the daily mail from an financial expert saying we've failed it due to our wage bill in 10/11 season. That gets wiped out next year but will city accept the fine as they know we will pass it from next season onwards? After all this 50m could be completely made up and we've got a fine much less than is reported.

That "financial expert" is Ed Thompson who is not an expert, been chewed up and spat out on here by Prestwich Blue and others. He is a self-appointed expert on FfP runs a website He trawls for info and then later repeats rumour and opinion of others as though it is fact


He was caught out yesterday. All he was doing was picking bits out of a Telegraph and Guardian article. Stuck them together and tried to claim it as his own article.

As usual he said "a source close to the process".

Even Hayward and Holt were disagreeing with him re FFP.

This belongs in the same box as the FArce disciplinary process. They are both made up on the hoof. Nobody can claim to understand either of them because they never stay the same with each incident that is on the table.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

kramer said:
Manchester_lalala said:
There's an article on the daily mail from an financial expert saying we've failed it due to our wage bill in 10/11 season. That gets wiped out next year but will city accept the fine as they know we will pass it from next season onwards? After all this 50m could be completely made up and we've got a fine much less than is reported.

That "financial expert" is Ed Thompson who is not an expert, been chewed up and spat out on here by Prestwich Blue and others. He is a self-appointed expert on FfP runs a website He trawls for info and then later repeats rumour and opinion of others as though it is fact
We're getting assessed on 2 seasons, 11/12 and 12/13, 10/11 doesn't come in to it at all, so as usual ed(case) is full of it.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

aguero93:20 said:
kramer said:
Manchester_lalala said:
There's an article on the daily mail from an financial expert saying we've failed it due to our wage bill in 10/11 season. That gets wiped out next year but will city accept the fine as they know we will pass it from next season onwards? After all this 50m could be completely made up and we've got a fine much less than is reported.

That "financial expert" is Ed Thompson who is not an expert, been chewed up and spat out on here by Prestwich Blue and others. He is a self-appointed expert on FfP runs a website He trawls for info and then later repeats rumour and opinion of others as though it is fact
We're getting assessed on 2 seasons, 11/12 and 12/13, 10/11 doesn't come in to it at all, so as usual ed(case) is full of it.

Unless this is the late change of goal posts being alluded to here by some that so royally pissed us off?
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

blueinsa said:
aguero93:20 said:
kramer said:
That "financial expert" is Ed Thompson who is not an expert, been chewed up and spat out on here by Prestwich Blue and others. He is a self-appointed expert on FfP runs a website He trawls for info and then later repeats rumour and opinion of others as though it is fact
We're getting assessed on 2 seasons, 11/12 and 12/13, 10/11 doesn't come in to it at all, so as usual ed(case) is full of it.

Unless this is the late change of goal posts being alluded to here by some that so royally pissed us off?
That would be quite a handy change of goalposts if so, applying laws retrospectively is completely illegal.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

gordondaviesmoustache said:
Dynamo11 said:
Would I be the only one who wouldn't give a shit if we were banned from Europe for a season?
I've come to quite enjoy imbibing the rich cultural canvas that visiting some of Europe's leading cities provides, by finding the biggest square and drinking there for two consecutive days.

Me too. How about a protest group heading out to Geneva to berate Platini's crew and enjoy more of the good life!!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.