City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

Re: City & FFP (continued)

Dribble said:
SteveinBeds said:
Dribble said:
Brilliant post.

The thing is though, if it does go to court, UEFA could be seen as the 'reasonable' party for having offered a prior settlement which we rejected. On the flip side, City could argue that any punishment was unfair, because by international accounting standards, we have complied and were left with no choice but to decline the offer and seek legal redress.

Platini is being blamed for all of this, but it shouldn't be forgotten that the Champions League only came about because of the threat from the G14 to break away from UEFA and form a European Super League. All said and done, Platini is just their Patsy.

I know a lot of us have said fuck UEFA, let's pull out of next year's competition and thus devalue it, but this is EXACTLY what the G14 want. The Champions League thrived just fine without us and I'm sure it will continue to without us even if we are the Premier League champions (which is still not a forgone conclusion.

Real, Barca, Bayern, ManUre, Milan, Juve, Inter, Arsenal, Liverpool, Chelsea. These are the top drawer teams who fans tune in to watch. The Champions League can survive without 1 or 2 of them for a few seasons (Liverpool, Rags, Milan, Inter, Juve), but if they were all to up sticks en masse, say 'fuck you UEFA' and set up their threatened invitation only league, the Champions League would be reduced to being akin to the Europa League and we all know it.

It's the G14 who are the problem and it's they where we should be concentrating our efforts. What we need to do imo, is not to call for the scrapping of FFP, but for its re-formulation as something that is truly fair. We should call for unsustainable debtto be tackled and not legitimate equity investment. We should call for a better distribution of funds throughout football from the top to the bottom and we should call for clear fresh rules about football from FIFA that doesn't stop ambitious clubs and protect the elite thus forming a cartel.

We can only effect UEFA from inside the organisation and not outside it. I hope we choose to fight, but we need to bee tactical and tear the enemy apart from within and use every resource we have at our disposal to do so. Let us legally and ethically highlight what we know is wrong in football and what they're trying to do to us and in doing so hopefully the law will deal with the G14 qnd UEFA, because on our own with FFP breathing down our necks we don't stand a chance against the corrupt bastards because they are acting as Judge and Jury!


A good summary about why it may well end up in the courts. Both parties will, no doubt, be warned about (quoting Donald Rumsfeld) the "unknown unknowns" which might arise before the case is heard and, it is my view that the outcome might not be what either party is asking for. I suppose we might accept a lower, but still substantial, cash fine provided that there are no player restrictions. Surely, the public as a whole should be able to watch next year's Champions League with all the teams playing with the same squad size?
If we were to play Barca again but they had a squad restriction in place, do you think any of us would be arsed if we beat them because of it? I don't think so. A win’s a win and most fans wouldn't give a shit how we achieved it, it's just the reality of the multi-billion pound football industry mate.

Understood and agree but but by the "public" I meant those watching the games who are not fans of either team. Presumably, this is the vast majority?
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

SteveinBeds said:
Dribble said:
SteveinBeds said:
A good summary about why it may well end up in the courts. Both parties will, no doubt, be warned about (quoting Donald Rumsfeld) the "unknown unknowns" which might arise before the case is heard and, it is my view that the outcome might not be what either party is asking for. I suppose we might accept a lower, but still substantial, cash fine provided that there are no player restrictions. Surely, the public as a whole should be able to watch next year's Champions League with all the teams playing with the same squad size?
If we were to play Barca again but they had a squad restriction in place, do you think any of us would be arsed if we beat them because of it? I don't think so. A win’s a win and most fans wouldn't give a shit how we achieved it, it's just the reality of the multi-billion pound football industry mate.

Understood and agree but but by the "public" I meant those watching the games who are not fans of either team. Presumably, this is the vast majority?
People in general watch football for entertainment. I don't think there'd be uproar in Chipping Ongar, Oslo or Donetsk if we had to play with a team restriction in place, tbh I don't think anyone outside of the fans it directly affects would care less.

If we only had limited funds and CSKA Moscow were threatened with these sanctions for investing too much in their club, in all honesty most of us wouldn't give a toss what happened to them whether they had a case or not. The point I'm making is regardless of the fan's personal opinion, most of them would never consider being proactive about it whether they agreed about it or not, that's why it's up to us to support and fight for our owner's right to invest in our club as he sees fit.

If we don't fight the fight, no-one else will.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

We should reject the Champions League for two seasons, Go out and buy the best players on a contract that states that whilst we are not in the CL they can recieve very high wages but after two years there wages will be brought back in line. Hopefully by then we will have also brought through some of our academy youth too. When we have the best players and have won the Prem two years in a row,plus the League cup and capitol one cup, people who have been watching our exciting brand of football and have started following us we can then re enter the CL, be stronger and comply with FFP as our revenue will have risen due to Sponsorship deals, shirt sales and players image rights.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

Rammy Blue said:
Good morning, FFP thread. Should be fun at some point today....
Lol

But you know what, FFP has been like a nagging pain in the background for the last week. Even before Vinny lifted the trophy, I noticed him dragging Micah up to take his place in the team photos and the first thing I thought was, 'If we do let him leave, which English player can we replace him with who's good enough to get into our team and how FFP will have a bearing on this unless we fight it to the death'.

Hearing that ManUre put in a £27m bid for Luke Shaw just brought it all home to me. Even if we wanted Shaw and had the money, could we spend it unless we sold every last one of the deadwood players we have, most of whom fill our homegrown quota?

We have to take the fight to the bastards if they carry out their reported threat of punitive sanctions against us. All the Rags a I know, realise that for now they can't beat us, but FFP can and the sly grins on their faces says it all.

Bastards the lot of them.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

cleavers said:
Daz_Blue said:
We should just fuck the champions league off .......
and what about the players that want to play in it, should we f**k them off too ? Not sure we'd be doing much title winning if we did.

Quite.

Not to mention the loss of perhaps €50m or €60m of prize money per annum which is enough to buy perhaps £100m of players, amortised over three year contracts, including wages.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.