City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

Re: City & FFP (continued)

patrickblue said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
coleridge said:
UEFA don't have the bottle. Champs of England and France. Arab owners. Endless cash. Media turning against the cartel. As I said last week, Plattini will go.
Where exactly is Platini going to go?
He is next in line for head of FIFA and has stuck 2 fingers up to PSG and us. The bloke is a ****. Honestly who gives a Frenchman power it goes right to his cheese eating surrender monkey head

It doesn't matter where he goes. The point is that he's spreading his credibility very thin, and may very easily end up with a massive amount of egg on his face.

Blatter says he wants to stand for a fifth term ... JOY!! ... He's barking mad!!! ....Platini on the other hand appears to be an arrogant c*nt !!
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

Bodicoteblue said:
Given that Bosman won his case on the grounds of "freedom of employment " laws which are enshrined in the EU constitution, then could the situation arise where say , we had a deal agreed with say , Mangala ( though it could be anyone) , fees agreed with his club, personal terms agreed with the player , and then Uefa tried to place a squad restriction on City, and we were forced to tell the player that we could not include him in the CL squad, because of the restrictions placed on us, would the player not have a rock solid case under the freedom of employment regs.
The precedent has been set by Bosman and restrictions by Uefa of this kind have surely been outlawed! As a direct result of uefas actions , a player would have his rights curtailed.
This would surely mean that any sort of squad restriction would be a contravention of the law as has already been decided in court.

I'm sure that they would argue that it is City that decides which players go in the squad once they know how many places are available. Therefore it would be City that would decide whether to pick eg Mangala or MDM and so UEFA wouldn't be restricting him but MCFC. As far as the squad restrictions go, they will say that City knew the rules. BTW I know we have been shafted and that this is unjust, I'm just pointing out the contrary view.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

Essex blue said:
Sorry guys I was bored but seeing as Chelsea have just bid £32 mill for costa got me thinking about recent net transfers.

Last 3 years the following teams have spent

Chelsea over £170 mill net
Liverpool over £96 mill nett
Man utd over £139 mill nett
Man city £141 mill nett

Will chelsea be in trouble next season with FFP? They are bound to spend more in the summer as are liverpool and utd!
They've gotten rid of a few of the big earners so the BT deal might get them out of the shit but it'll be a close run thing.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

Essex blue said:
Sorry guys I was bored but seeing as Chelsea have just bid £32 mill for costa got me thinking about recent net transfers.

Last 3 years the following teams have spent

Chelsea over £170 mill net
Liverpool over £96 mill nett
Man utd over £139 mill nett
Man city £141 mill nett

Will chelsea be in trouble next season with FFP? They are bound to spend more in the summer as are liverpool and utd!
It's impossible to say. You're asking for a simplistic answer to a complex question. Chelsea sign Diego Costa for £32m and it gets apportioned over the life of his contract. So if it's 5 years, it goes in the accounts at £6.4m a year. Let's assume they pay him £120k a week, which is another £6.2m a year. So that's an additional cost of £12.6m. But it depends on what revenue they have coming in and what costs they remove from the books. So if Ashley Cole is on £160k a week, they lose £8.3m a year. If Ba is on £120k a week and goes, they lose another £6.2m a year.

That means Ba and Cole go, Costa comes in but they're still a couple of million a year better off.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

Where have all the stories in the press gone? Funny old thing, but it seemed that on the eve of our last 3 or 4 games some 'source' was quoted as giving our ffp transgressions and punishments, but today it's all gone quiet.
Anyone else smelling bullshit?
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

Helmet Cole said:
Where have all the stories in the press gone? Funny old thing, but it seemed that on the eve of our last 3 or 4 games some 'source' was quoted as giving our ffp transgressions and punishments, but today it's all gone quiet.
Anyone else smelling bullshit?

All I'll say is everyone involved in the process has to sign confidentiality clauses so I see speculation as just that.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

JoeMercer'sWay said:
Helmet Cole said:
Where have all the stories in the press gone? Funny old thing, but it seemed that on the eve of our last 3 or 4 games some 'source' was quoted as giving our ffp transgressions and punishments, but today it's all gone quiet.
Anyone else smelling bullshit?

All I'll say is everyone involved in the process has to sign confidentiality clauses so I see speculation as just that.

How does that fit in with UEFA's transparency rules then?
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

Kinkys Left Foot said:
JoeMercer'sWay said:
Helmet Cole said:
Where have all the stories in the press gone? Funny old thing, but it seemed that on the eve of our last 3 or 4 games some 'source' was quoted as giving our ffp transgressions and punishments, but today it's all gone quiet.
Anyone else smelling bullshit?

All I'll say is everyone involved in the process has to sign confidentiality clauses so I see speculation as just that.

How does that fit in with UEFA's transparency rules then?

I guess it's confidential till a solution is agreed, or it's decided it will go to the chamber.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

Helmet Cole said:
Where have all the stories in the press gone? Funny old thing, but it seemed that on the eve of our last 3 or 4 games some 'source' was quoted as giving our ffp transgressions and punishments, but today it's all gone quiet.
Anyone else smelling bullshit?

UEFA still haven't made any official statement about either us or PSG. Maybe it's slowly dawned on the press that all they've been doing is repeating what they've heard other reporters say, and back at the beginning of the chain, there's just a single hack who made everything up that just snowballed into a gigantic mass of low quality journalism.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.