Re: City & FFP (continued)
Maybe but i believe it will because thats 100M Euros going forward every year and UEFA will also have similar restirctions preventing them from simply increasing the value of other sponsorships
Our owners always wanted us to be break even and have been working towards that for a few years now - PSG dont have the advantage of EPL revenues etc so the Quatari tourism deal was a big big deal
In terms of winning the French league then FFFP wont realy hurt them but stock piling world class players is going to be difficult
GXCity said:dctid said:bluemoon32 said:I'll never understand why we haven't fought this and ended up just bending over and taking it.
Gives the impression we've been naughty, were caught cooking the books and have now accepted the charges as we believe we've gotten off lightly.
There's more to this than meets the eye
City did not fight it because quite simply the legal assessment and / or business assessment (which is what the City statement implies) was such that there was no significant prospect of a positive outcome
Simply put the risks were too great so we had little option other than to take it
PSG got off far far worse with the marking down of the tourist deal and this will hit them for years to come
It was marked down to €100m. The Etihad deal is only £40m so it's hardly going to hit them too hard.
Maybe but i believe it will because thats 100M Euros going forward every year and UEFA will also have similar restirctions preventing them from simply increasing the value of other sponsorships
Our owners always wanted us to be break even and have been working towards that for a few years now - PSG dont have the advantage of EPL revenues etc so the Quatari tourism deal was a big big deal
In terms of winning the French league then FFFP wont realy hurt them but stock piling world class players is going to be difficult