City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

Re: City & FFP (continued)

If mass number protest is the way to go then making a multiple club thing initially has to be the way to go. Look how shit our media is. WE have to their drop their level of intelligence and aplease the plastics. The initial news needs to read fans from several premier league clubs contest uefa corruption rather than bitter city fans take uefa to court over fpp sanctions. We are a nation of thick twats spoon fed shit in the media and need to behave accordingly afterall
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

I have struggled with this FFP from the start, as i do not understand how someone is told they can not spend their own money. And i still dont understand it, the more i read these pages the more it confuses me how this has been accepted, not only by the teams in the premier league but all the other teams in europe.
I also dont understand how a fine helps this situation, how does getting a fine help any team become more finacially stable? Surely providing accountants and advisors would help the teams that struggled with losses?
To break even, teams need more revenue. Why does it matter if the sponsor is willing to pay an inflated price? If they are willing and the money is deposited into the account and both parties are happy, what is the problem with that?
Reading the above agreements what is this about? "Manchester City has agreed that for the period of the settlement it will not seek to improve the financial terms of two second tier commercial partnerships". Why as champions of england the most watched league in the world, whilst scoring the most goals (one of the main objectives of the game) can we not seek improved financial terms? Surely if an advisor would say "ok lets see who we feel we can get more money out of and move from there".
If someone could answer those i would greatly appreciate it.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

I don't care whether they fined us 100 million to 100 billion dollars. I want to know why Real, Barca, United and Chelsea were found
not to be guilty either. One year Real spent 300 million dollars and it didn't get them anything. I also want to know how the special
government status given Real and Barca effects the FFP rules. I also want to understand how we are supposed to compete with
larger clubs with more revenue?? I want a written, legal document on every point of City's probation or I would tell them to stuff it,
One of our fans has got to be a layer or a barrister and can pick apart the actual punishment and the real story. I want the truth on this!
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

yankcitizen76 said:
I don't care whether they fined us 100 million to 100 billion dollars. I want to know why Real, Barca, United and Chelsea were found
not to be guilty either. One year Real spent 300 million dollars and it didn't get them anything. I also want to know how the special
government status given Real and Barca effects the FFP rules. I also want to understand how we are supposed to compete with
larger clubs with more revenue?? I want a written, legal document on every point of City's probation or I would tell them to stuff it,
One of our fans has got to be a layer or a barrister and can pick apart the actual punishment and the real story. I want the truth on this!

There isn't really much to pick apart. FFP is not a legal act or document. It is simply rules which supposedly define a club attaining a UEFA license, no license means no competition in UEFA competitions. In UEFA's judgement we have failed those rules and really a legal challenge is difficult because it will take ages and there is no guarantee of winning. European Law is notoriously open to interpretation and the result would pretty much be dependent on what is best for Europe and football as opposed to us or UEFA. The EU likes to give sport a degree of autonomy when dealing with it's own affairs so I think it is likely that they will side with UEFA. I once said on here that FFP would be defeated if it ever got to court but the problem is City cannot really challenge our sanctions with the EU, we must go for the whole thing. City can appoint lawyers to challenge FFP as a whole in court but that has not happened and probably will never happen because of the huge process involved. We also won't challenge it because after the coming year FFP is irrelevant to us because we are on target to break even and pass anyway. What we will never see though from us and we have never seen anyway is a huge transfer like Messi or Ronaldo for £100M+ and FFP will directly prevent that in the future at other clubs too.

We are currently on target to break even and make a profit in the future and that is why City are so narked with UEFA because we worked with them and showed them how our business plan meant we aren't reckless but we are building something. Instead UEFA chose to sanction us and we have basically been made an example of. The other clubs passed because they were relatively pragmatic, we instead chose to carry on spending and that is why we failed FFP. I'm assuming however this was all on the presumption that UEFA gave some signal that a small breach would be met lightly but this has not been the case and we have been made an example of.

Chelsea, United, Barca, Real all passed FFP which is amazing considering their spending but you have to remember that they all have won absolutely nothing between them (Real could win the CL still!) and this is likely because they haven't been able to properly spend. We however threw caution to the wind and decided to spend and that is why we have failed but it is also arguably why we won 2 trophies this season. I'd take that any day.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

<a class="postlink" href="http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/manchester-city-urged-challenge-ffp-7142304" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/ ... fp-7142304</a>
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

mannion18 said:
I have struggled with this FFP from the start, as i do not understand how someone is told they can not spend their own money. And i still dont understand it, the more i read these pages the more it confuses me how this has been accepted, not only by the teams in the premier league but all the other teams in europe.
I also dont understand how a fine helps this situation, how does getting a fine help any team become more finacially stable? Surely providing accountants and advisors would help the teams that struggled with losses?
To break even, teams need more revenue. Why does it matter if the sponsor is willing to pay an inflated price? If they are willing and the money is deposited into the account and both parties are happy, what is the problem with that?
Reading the above agreements what is this about? "Manchester City has agreed that for the period of the settlement it will not seek to improve the financial terms of two second tier commercial partnerships". Why as champions of england the most watched league in the world, whilst scoring the most goals (one of the main objectives of the game) can we not seek improved financial terms? Surely if an advisor would say "ok lets see who we feel we can get more money out of and move from there".
If someone could answer those i would greatly appreciate it.
FFP is a device of the old powerful clubs who saw first Chelsea, then MCFC, PSG, Shakhtar Donetsk etc and a whole wave of money being ploughed into football by oligarchs which threatened to displace clubs which had been at the top of the pile for decades.

If City tried to take on FFP they would be taking on the football establishment and we might not win, and it will take years during which City would lose all their players, and they'd be outcasts. It also goes against why City were purchased in the fist place. Do you think Sheikh Mansour would want to take on UEFA?

We are twice Champions, we are on the verge of breaking even so why challenge it and risk all when in 12 months we can beat it, and carry on playing football.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

kiam06 said:
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/manchester-city-urged-challenge-ffp-7142304

Why is he suggesting the fans try to get a judge to stay the execution of the FFP sanctions? Cant he make that application?
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

cibaman said:
kiam06 said:
http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/manchester-city-urged-challenge-ffp-7142304

Why is he suggesting the fans try to get a judge to stay the execution of the FFP sanctions? Cant he make that application?

At a guess it needs someone that is actually affected by our punishment. Club could but doesnt want to, fans could, sponsors could.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

inbetween said:
yankcitizen76 said:
I don't care whether they fined us 100 million to 100 billion dollars. I want to know why Real, Barca, United and Chelsea were found
not to be guilty either. One year Real spent 300 million dollars and it didn't get them anything. I also want to know how the special
government status given Real and Barca effects the FFP rules. I also want to understand how we are supposed to compete with
larger clubs with more revenue?? I want a written, legal document on every point of City's probation or I would tell them to stuff it,
One of our fans has got to be a layer or a barrister and can pick apart the actual punishment and the real story. I want the truth on this!

There isn't really much to pick apart. FFP is not a legal act or document. It is simply rules which supposedly define a club attaining a UEFA license, no license means no competition in UEFA competitions. In UEFA's judgement we have failed those rules and really a legal challenge is difficult because it will take ages and there is no guarantee of winning. European Law is notoriously open to interpretation and the result would pretty much be dependent on what is best for Europe and football as opposed to us or UEFA. The EU likes to give sport a degree of autonomy when dealing with it's own affairs so I think it is likely that they will side with UEFA. I once said on here that FFP would be defeated if it ever got to court but the problem is City cannot really challenge our sanctions with the EU, we must go for the whole thing. City can appoint lawyers to challenge FFP as a whole in court but that has not happened and probably will never happen because of the huge process involved. We also won't challenge it because after the coming year FFP is irrelevant to us because we are on target to break even and pass anyway. What we will never see though from us and we have never seen anyway is a huge transfer like Messi or Ronaldo for £100M+ and FFP will directly prevent that in the future at other clubs too.

We are currently on target to break even and make a profit in the future and that is why City are so narked with UEFA because we worked with them and showed them how our business plan meant we aren't reckless but we are building something. Instead UEFA chose to sanction us and we have basically been made an example of. The other clubs passed because they were relatively pragmatic, we instead chose to carry on spending and that is why we failed FFP. I'm assuming however this was all on the presumption that UEFA gave some signal that a small breach would be met lightly but this has not been the case and we have been made an example of.

Chelsea, United, Barca, Real all passed FFP which is amazing considering their spending but you have to remember that they all have won absolutely nothing between them (Real could win the CL still!) and this is likely because they haven't been able to properly spend. We however threw caution to the wind and decided to spend and that is why we have failed but it is also arguably why we won 2 trophies this season. I'd take that any day.

Its is widely accepted that Sport gets a reasonable degree of autonomy.
The question is here is where does sport end and business begin.
The definition of sport is
"An activity involving physical exertion and skill in which an individual or team competes against another or others for entertainment:"

It is when you get into the realms of professional sport that contract law, employment law, h&s law, torts etc.

What Uefa (& G14) are actually doing is trying to hide behind the "sporting exemptions" to produce rules for which it could be argued that are technically not compliant with EU law.

Smaller clubs (those outside the G14) have a variety of reasons not to challenge them at the moment (owners self interest, can't afford to, rules do not overly affect them (right now) or just fear of the bullys.

City are not in that position, I do not think they are scared of the bullys, I just think the rules don't overly affect them right now. They are on target to break even and move into profitability, They have a strategy which will shortly make them a finacially powerful club that falls within the FFP rules. Why should they rock the boat, they want to join the elite and make the G14 the G15.

I just hope and pray that when we (City) get there and achieve G15 status we remember our roots, our fight with FFP, the fans of football and continue the fight against this unfair restriction from within.

Let someone else take the fight, maybe the new owner of Villa, maybe West Ham, who are about to move into a new stadium, maybe the next Max Griggs (Rushden and Diamonds). In no other industry is owner investment disallowed, why should it be in football.
 
Re: City & FFP (continued)

MrE said:
inbetween said:
yankcitizen76 said:
I don't care whether they fined us 100 million to 100 billion dollars. I want to know why Real, Barca, United and Chelsea were found
not to be guilty either. One year Real spent 300 million dollars and it didn't get them anything. I also want to know how the special
government status given Real and Barca effects the FFP rules. I also want to understand how we are supposed to compete with
larger clubs with more revenue?? I want a written, legal document on every point of City's probation or I would tell them to stuff it,
One of our fans has got to be a layer or a barrister and can pick apart the actual punishment and the real story. I want the truth on this!

There isn't really much to pick apart. FFP is not a legal act or document. It is simply rules which supposedly define a club attaining a UEFA license, no license means no competition in UEFA competitions. In UEFA's judgement we have failed those rules and really a legal challenge is difficult because it will take ages and there is no guarantee of winning. European Law is notoriously open to interpretation and the result would pretty much be dependent on what is best for Europe and football as opposed to us or UEFA. The EU likes to give sport a degree of autonomy when dealing with it's own affairs so I think it is likely that they will side with UEFA. I once said on here that FFP would be defeated if it ever got to court but the problem is City cannot really challenge our sanctions with the EU, we must go for the whole thing. City can appoint lawyers to challenge FFP as a whole in court but that has not happened and probably will never happen because of the huge process involved. We also won't challenge it because after the coming year FFP is irrelevant to us because we are on target to break even and pass anyway. What we will never see though from us and we have never seen anyway is a huge transfer like Messi or Ronaldo for £100M+ and FFP will directly prevent that in the future at other clubs too.

We are currently on target to break even and make a profit in the future and that is why City are so narked with UEFA because we worked with them and showed them how our business plan meant we aren't reckless but we are building something. Instead UEFA chose to sanction us and we have basically been made an example of. The other clubs passed because they were relatively pragmatic, we instead chose to carry on spending and that is why we failed FFP. I'm assuming however this was all on the presumption that UEFA gave some signal that a small breach would be met lightly but this has not been the case and we have been made an example of.

Chelsea, United, Barca, Real all passed FFP which is amazing considering their spending but you have to remember that they all have won absolutely nothing between them (Real could win the CL still!) and this is likely because they haven't been able to properly spend. We however threw caution to the wind and decided to spend and that is why we have failed but it is also arguably why we won 2 trophies this season. I'd take that any day.

Its is widely accepted that Sport gets a reasonable degree of autonomy.
The question is here is where does sport end and business begin.
The definition of sport is
"An activity involving physical exertion and skill in which an individual or team competes against another or others for entertainment:"

It is when you get into the realms of professional sport that contract law, employment law, h&s law, torts etc.

What Uefa (& G14) are actually doing is trying to hide behind the "sporting exemptions" to produce rules for which it could be argued that are technically not compliant with EU law.

Smaller clubs (those outside the G14) have a variety of reasons not to challenge them at the moment (owners self interest, can't afford to, rules do not overly affect them (right now) or just fear of the bullys.

City are not in that position, I do not think they are scared of the bullys, I just think the rules don't overly affect them right now. They are on target to break even and move into profitability, They have a strategy which will shortly make them a finacially powerful club that falls within the FFP rules. Why should they rock the boat, they want to join the elite and make the G14 the G15.

I just hope and pray that when we (City) get there and achieve G15 status we remember our roots, our fight with FFP, the fans of football and continue the fight against this unfair restriction from within.

Let someone else take the fight, maybe the new owner of Villa, maybe West Ham, who are about to move into a new stadium, maybe the next Max Griggs (Rushden and Diamonds). In no other industry is owner investment disallowed, why should it be in football.

Thing is, UEFA needed to be taken to court by City like they needed a hole in the head. Zero debt. Investment in the academy. Investment in infrastructure. Investment in the local community. Investment in the team that's taken us from also rans to title winners, The trajectory towards break even. The very model of how to take a club and break into the elite that FFP seeks to prevent.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.