City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

[M18CTID]

Very well worded posts on that mate, nice one.

Thanks mate. Much of it isn't rocket science though - it just helps to be in possession of a few facts in order to present a solid argument. Even then, you can't always change everyone's thinking lol.

 

[EricBrooksGhost]

Very well worded posts on that mate, nice one.

That Jambug is a bitter ****

 

[aguero93:20]

I should point out that the £75m is a guesstimate maximum figure for PSG to stay within their settlement (excluding sales) - baring in mind how far away from break even they were and without a massive TV deal to help them.
Our guesstimate maximum is £150m + sales.

I wouldn't be so sure. I'm sure Dupont had great fun beating UEFA over the head in Brussels with that 'devalued' sponsorship deal. That's right up there on the list of 'Things UEFA had no business doing or right to do' and no amount of hiding behind the EU/IASB definition of an RPT will change that.

 

[aguero93:20]

That Jambug is a bitter ****

Should shorten his name to just Bug.

 

[S04]

Thanks mate. Much of it isn't rocket science though - it just helps to be in possession of a few facts in order to present a solid argument. Even then, you can't always change everyone's thinking lol.

Have you missed that Emirates Airways is owned by the Emir of Dubai.. Who happens to be Sheikh Mansours father in law :D

 

[JoeMercer'sWay]

I wouldn't be so sure. I'm sure Dupont had great fun beating UEFA over the head in Brussels with that 'devalued' sponsorship deal. That's right up there on the list of 'Things UEFA had no business doing or right to do' and no amount of hiding behind the EU/IASB definition of an RPT will change that.

not so sure, they hammered Dinamo Moskva for that just a few weeks ago, 4 year ban from Europe, so it's something they feel confident about.

 

[aguero93:20]

not so sure, they hammered Dinamo Moskva for that just a few weeks ago, 4 year ban from Europe, so it's something they feel confident about.

It's something they shouldn't feel confident about. They've in doing so appointed themselves regulator of football marketing and advertising within Europe.

 

[chedinho]

It's something they shouldn't feel confident about. They've in doing so appointed themselves regulator of football marketing and advertising within Europe.

if Russia are not in the EU,then they will effectively have one hand tied behind their back.
Im just trying to make sense of both your arguments,as uefa dont make any sense at all.

 

[Luke The Blue]

I find it hard to follow this thread, can someone kindly explain as simple as they can whether FFP relaxation has benefit us. Thanks blue's.

 

[aguero93:20]

I find it hard to follow this thread, can someone kindly explain as simple as they can whether FFP relaxation has benefit us. Thanks blue's.

It doesn't matter to us anymore, our income has grown too much.

 

[aguero93:20]

if Russia are not in the EU,then they will effectively have one hand tied behind their back.
Im just trying to make sense of both your arguments,as uefa dont make any sense at all.

PSG are from France.

 

[chedinho]

PSG are from France.

apologies,
i was referring to Dinomo Moscow being banned from Europe.

 

[The Stockport Iniesta]

Want some more entertaining reading? Check out the comments underneath the article:

http://untold-arsenal.com/archives/44461

Well played blue, in football terms your winning that argument about 5-0.

 

[Luke The Blue]

It doesn't matter to us anymore, our income has grown too much.

Thanks mate, does this mean we will still have to spend within our limit and if so how much roughly? sorry I'm useless with FFP :)

 

[prestonibbo_mcfc]

Just to clarify. We will never be getting any money BACK, as we never gave it in the first place.
All penalties were deducted from monies owed to us by Uefa, through Champions League payments.
We've never sent them a penny. We had money withheld.

 

[Sir peace frog]

Well played blue, in football terms your winning that argument about 5-0.

thanks mate,i like to come across as a pie eating cave man on bluemoon,but on other teams forums im just being myself m:)

 

[BlueMoonion]

Probably have to spend within our means still, but with our increasing profit turnover and the bumper TV money, we can probably splash out more now without the UEFA restrictions.

 

[paulchapo]

It is a relief UEFA have taken the constraints off and it means we can now compete at the top table again without one hand tied behind our backs.I feared they were going to stitch us up again but they are obviously fearful of the impending court case so back tracked somewhat.

 

[citizen_maine]

It is a relief UEFA have taken the constraints off and it means we can now compete at the top table again without one hand tied behind our backs.I feared they were going to stitch us up again but they are obviously fearful of the impending court case so back tracked somewhat.

They didn't backtrack. They agreed a settlement with us and we fulfilled our side of it

 

[aguero93:20]

Thanks mate, does this mean we will still have to spend within our limit and if so how much roughly? sorry I'm useless with FFP :)

We still have to spend within limits. Couldn't tell you how much, it depends on future income predictions and how much the current squad are costing us on the books as well as what we're earning now.