City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

citizen_maine said:
Whilst this is obviously spot on, it is based on the assumption that the PL will also use IAS24 as their test for 'related' parties. The only worry would be that they know IAS24 clears us so may look for a different definition. Or have they confirmed they're using IAS24?
Click to expand...
It used to be word for word from IAS24 into the Handbook

They might have changed it since but back when this first kicked off, they mirrored
 
Have a listen to what the self professed expert on the Kick Off has to say about what's wrong with the current state of football:




This has almost a quarter of a million views, what is he talking about? It's people like this, that misinform the masses.
"It's owners like Manchester City's competing against the PL and UEFA. We want the league/champions league to look like this"
Click to expand...
So it's City, who are trying to add legislation by strong-arming the PL and UEFA? No, I think he'll find that's exactly what his own club's American owners and the rest of the cartel club owners have been doing. He even tried to say City's owners are the ones trying to create new leagues as response to Liverpool trying to add more restrictions and legislation. How can he have it so wrong?
"Buvey sat and said we weren't found guilty[he probably said exonerated by a real court]. Do you know why Manchester City weren't found guilty... They were obstructive throughout the whole process, didn't show anyone the paperwork... 'lost' a lot of the papers. No problem there we'll pay the fine"
Click to expand...
Mostly nonsense that, uncooperative was what City were said to be but it didn't start out that way. He made no mention of the leaks to the press which damaged the confidence City had in getting a fair hearing from UEFA. No mention of the complaint City lodged with the CAS about a lack of due process from the investigatory chamber. No mention that they beleieved Leterme had ignored “a comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence” which the club sent to him and expected feedback/questions about.

The most interesting part of his rant, was when he started talking about City digging up dirt on Bayern Munich and Manchester United, as a reason City were exonerated.

He clearly doesn't know how the CAS works. Once it's in their hands, it would be no good making threats to UEFA, Bayern or United. UEFA themselves thought they had proved City were guilty until CAS showed them why they hadn't proven anything. That's just the difference between an organisation that knows how to run a proper court and one that is winging it for show. If what he said was true, then UEFA wouldn't have given their original verdict that had to be taken to the CAS to get due diligence and due process. I really hope City do have dirt on the cartel clubs, Lawrence's reaction to the possibility of that is a little strange to me. Like the cartel clubs should be untouchable from the same tactics used on City. In a way, it's like he's acknowledged it was a clear and organised attack.
 
Last edited:
Metalartin said:
Have a listen to what the self professed expert on the Kick Off has to say about what's wrong with the current state of football:




This has almost a quarter of a million views, what is he talking about? It's people like this, that misinform the masses.

So it's City, who are trying to add legislation by strong-arming the PL and UEFA? No, I think he'll find that's exactly what his own club's American owners and the rest of the cartel club owners have been doing. He even tried to say City's owners are the ones trying to create new leagues as response to Liverpool trying to add more restrictions and legislation. How can he have it so wrong?

Mostly nonsense that, uncooperative was what City were said to be but it didn't start out that way. He made no mention of the leaks to the press which damaged the confidence City had in getting a fair hearing from UEFA. No mention of the complaint City lodged with the CAS about a lack of due process from the investigatory chamber. No mention that they beleieved Leterme had ignored “a comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence” which the club sent to him and expected feedback/questions about.

The most interesting part of his rant, was when he started talking about City digging up dirt on Bayern Munich and Manchester United, as a reason City were exonerated.

He clearly doesn't know how the CAS works. Once it's in their hands, it would be no good making threats to UEFA, Bayern or United. UEFA themselves thought they had proved City were guilty until CAS showed them why they hadn't proven anything. That's just the difference between an organisation that knows how to run a proper court and one that is winging it for show. If what he said was true, then UEFA wouldn't have given their original verdict that had to be taken to the CAS to get due diligence and due process. I really hope City do have dirt on the cartel clubs, Lawrence's reaction to the possibility of that is a little strange to me. Like the cartel clubs should be untouchable from the same tactics used on City. In a way, it's like he's acknowledged it was a clear and organised attack.
Click to expand...

Its those damn arabs again, with their filthy oil money.
 
It's all gone quiet on the PL investigation into our finances, is this still on going?
 
Semper aggressus said:
Why isn’t it considered economic doping spending close to £500m on Sanchez, Pogba, Fred, Maguire, Ronaldo and Fernandes, plus millions a week in wages, on the back of a £400m debt loaded onto the club?
Click to expand...
Because mu was a member of G14 and everything they do comes up roses.
 
Semper aggressus said:
Why isn’t it considered economic doping spending close to £500m on Sanchez, Pogba, Fred, Maguire, Ronaldo and Fernandes, plus millions a week in wages, on the back of a £400m debt loaded onto the club?
Click to expand...
This scenario was of course, the original aim of platini’s first incarnation of ffp,(possibly the only time he made any sense), but he soon had his mind changed for him by certain parties, so they could concentrate on legitimate businessmen investing their own money in their own businesses.
Whatever happened to that nice m. Platini?
Nothing but good things, I hope.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top