nmc
Well-Known Member
Were supposed to punish PSG as well but they are too busy completing their Panini sticker books!
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)
- Thread starter Marvin
- Start date
Were supposed to punish PSG as well but they are too busy completing their Panini sticker books!
Sir Joe Aguero
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Feb 2012
- Messages
- 3,069
UEFA cannot penalise City because every one of our major sponsorship deals are undervalued though.
Even Swiss Ramble said that two years ago:
Shirt sponsor
Etihad: £20m
Chevrolet / United: £56m
Yokohama / Chelsea: £40m
Arsenal / Emirates: £40m
Stadium sponsor
Etihad: £20m (and surrounding campus)
Arsenal / Emirates: £20m
Shirt manufacturer
Nike: £20m (rumoured to be £50m with Puma from 2019)
United / Adidas: £75m
Chelsea / Nike: £60m
New stadium sponsorship deal: The Etihad 100 Points Fuck You All Stadium. £250mil a year.
feedmpenzaandhewillscore
Well-Known Member
Did you know that the UAE has four nuclear reactors under construction one of which is supposed to come on line this year? They are also sending an orbiter to Mars in 2 years time. More than dirty oil.
We will soon be spending our 'dirty nuclear fusion' money soon then?
dickie davies
Well-Known Member
City, ruining space exploration from 2020!Did you know that the UAE has four nuclear reactors under construction one of which is supposed to come on line this year? They are also sending an orbiter to Mars in 2 years time. More than dirty oil.
Chris in London
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 12,989
IIRC a long time ago Big Mal said Manchester City would be the first team to play on Mars...Did you know that the UAE has four nuclear reactors under construction one of which is supposed to come on line this year? They are also sending an orbiter to Mars in 2 years time. More than dirty oil.
Fission reactors. Not fusion. The cost of building Hinckley C is £20 billion. And then consider that its waste will need storing for a million years. Long term underground. But then that needs to be the size of manchester 300 m or more below ground. Massive technological undertaking that no society on earth has yet go to grips with. there are plans, and some are close, but none have been successfully implemented. The Germans are scrapping nuclear power. The Chinese are embracing it. Different nations have different policies. UAE probably like all emerging nations is trying to secure minds and develop its human potential. Smart move, but for me, fission technology is flawed. The cost of making fission nuclear power work are enormous because no one considers the long term problem of waste storage.We will soon be spending our 'dirty nuclear fusion' money soon then?
whp.blue
Well-Known Member
Wow fusion reactors!We will soon be spending our 'dirty nuclear fusion' money soon then?
free world wide power now we've cracked that one.
IIRC a long time ago Big Mal said Manchester City would be the first team to play on Mars...
Wouldn't we need somebody to play against?
nmc
Well-Known Member
Fission reactors. Not fusion. The cost of building Hinckley C is £20 billion. And then consider that its waste will need storing for a million years. Long term underground. But then that needs to be the size of manchester 300 m or more below ground. Massive technological undertaking that no society on earth has yet go to grips with. there are plans, and some are close, but none have been successfully implemented. The Germans are scrapping nuclear power. The Chinese are embracing it. Different nations have different policies. UAE probably like all emerging nations is trying to secure minds and develop its human potential. Smart move, but for me, fission technology is flawed. The cost of making fission nuclear power work are enormous because no one considers the long term problem of waste storage.
The UK seems to be embracing it - but without making any kind of economic case for it. The costs of storage, construction and decommissioning are eye watering and almost certainly cant be covered by the profits of generating electricity from a reactor.