M
M
mat
Guest
That's a brilliantly looking evil picture you found there.Don't be paranoid. Who in the FA could possibly want to discredit us?
That's a brilliantly looking evil picture you found there.Don't be paranoid. Who in the FA could possibly want to discredit us?
I wouldn't be so quick to give out credit, Gill always looks like an evil ****.That's a brilliantly looking evil picture you found there.
Agreed.I wouldn't be so quick to give out credit, Gill always looks like an evil ****.
The journos are always photoshopping the things out of his pics.Agreed.
Just needs some horns photoshopped on him.
Fleetwood fined £4k for the same offence, think we might be lucky here and get away lightly - 4 year ban and £60bn fine?
That's grand, I thought they were going to insist the rags get the 3 points for the rearranged derby.I heard a whisper that we are expecting a £10k fine with another £50k deferred if another failure happens in the next 2 years and we HAVE to play Bravo in net for the rest of the season.
Well the other crowd (Fleetwood) had their punishment decided last week and we were given an extension of 3 weeks or so to respond to the charge so it's not gone on ridiculously long tbh. It's probably a low priority issue when compared to charges that can result in players missing games and the ongoing task of the committee members trying with the use of both hands to locate their rear ends.Have I missed anything on this ? Given that we have admitted the offence, I'm beginning to get a bit concerned about the length of time it is taking Gill and his cronies to come up with an "appropriate" punishment.
Well the other crowd (Fleetwood) had their punishment decided last week and we were given an extension of 3 weeks or so to respond to the charge so it's not gone on ridiculously long tbh. It's probably a low priority issue when compared to charges that can result in players missing games and the ongoing task of the committee members trying with the use of both hands to locate their rear ends.