This action against PL is about our future sponsorships & it also seems we may have had a ruling against a recent sponsorship renewal owing to unfair value. Seems we’ve had enough of other clubs trying to thwart our growth
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
adzmcfc134
Well-Known Member
This should have its own thread. Nothing to do with the charges.
They make it sound sooo reasonable, the rule introduction. And so menacing, the club's challenge.
'Then rules, designed to save the world, end poverty, and cure all known illnesses, are being challenged by City, who if successful, plan to return the world to the 13th century full of plague and shit on the streets'. Aye, ok The Times.
'Then rules, designed to save the world, end poverty, and cure all known illnesses, are being challenged by City, who if successful, plan to return the world to the 13th century full of plague and shit on the streets'. Aye, ok The Times.
Depends how you look at it.Wouldn't that make the glass even emptier
dadnlad
Well-Known Member
all yanks please stand upThink it’s saying 12 clubs supporting the PL’s position.
bluwes
Well-Known Member
It says between 10 and 12 clubs. So between 6 and 8 haven’tContrary to that 12 clubs have come in favor of pl and only one with us .
ayrshire_blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2008
- Messages
- 6,142
Yep. I’m seeing a real siege mentality from others because of this but all it’s done for me is cause worry - if the club were as confident as they let on about winning the 115 case there wouldn’t be any need for this, surely?
It's a totally separate issue.
When the rules were put into place City put on record that they had issues with the legality of them. If we as a club are now losing out on genuine sponsorship revenue because we're yet again being stitched up with further new rules to stop our success then why on earth should we not fight it?
Big up to the club I say, wish we had adopted this stance when FFP first became a thing too.
That depends on your perception :-)Wouldn't that make the glass even emptier
The Light Was Yellow Sir
Well-Known Member
Telling us all how worried they are and how it looks bad for City…..this will wake some sleeper cells up
wait for the not posted for a while or first time poster long time lurcker
ayrshire_blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 May 2008
- Messages
- 6,142
They make it sound sooo reasonable, the rule introduction. And so menacing, the club's challenge.
'Then rules, designed to save the world, end poverty, and cure all known illnesses, are being challenged by City, who if successful, plan to return the world to the 13th century full of plague and shit on the streets'. Aye, ok The Times.
Correct, well said.