City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

[malg]

Put this on the RedCaf meltdown...but hey ho.

Look at the state of this ****...

 

[Bluearmy]

Why don’t they just broadcast the judges’ summary statement. It is clear and damning of the PL.

Think you've answered your own question ;)

 

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Come on, he's analyses what he see's. The problem is it's hard to analyse things you can't see. There was very very little information coming out other than we've won some bits for one journo and also a rule was dropped at a PL meeting. That's it, that's all we had to work with, so it made it virtually impossible to say anything about the judgement

That’s also a very good point. It’s much harder giving a reliable legal view if you aren’t in full view of the facts.

The only way to avoid it in those circumstances would be not give any view at all, which would have made this and the other thread far less absorbing.

 

[MMA]

Can't wait for Lego heads next interview.
I wonder if any journalist will ask him about interest free loans and cheating..
You know like they've done to pep for years.
@arsenaldarkarts

 

[Brendan110_0]

Part 2 to come next, compensation for lost revenue, wonder what deals the PL scuppered?

 

[Blue Llama]

The BBC have signalled in various ways recently that they have taken a very anti-City stance, so I am not really surprised.

But it is still shocking when considered against their mandate as a supposed guardian of public trust.

They should apply that fact checking/verifying department to the sports section.

 

[OntarioBlue]

Why are they disappointed ? I read the Premier League’s statement and clearly they won. I assumed they’d all be popping champagne corks - paid for with interest free borrowed money no doubt.

 

[flb]

I think it’s obvious the club tipped off some of the media when the ruling was released in Sept. The prem wanted time to get their ducks in a row, and we didn’t just sit and wait. No way Samuels, and others in media have drafted that article so quickly following the official publication.

And probably why that slaphead CEO at Arsenal pissed off up the steps of the corporate section when Stones slammed in the equaliser

 

[mancboy]

Come on, he's analyses what he see's. The problem is it's hard to analyse things you can't see. There was very very little information coming out other than we've won some bits for one journo and also a rule was dropped at a PL meeting. That's it, that's all we had to work with, so it made it virtually impossible to say anything about the judgement

He chose to quote tariq panja while also saying on talksport that he thought we wouldnt win, clearly an intelligent and well informed man but the sources you use and the company you keep goes along way.

 

[Bluearmy]

Put this on the RedCaf meltdown...but hey ho.

Look at the state of this ****...

View attachment 134251

He’s got a point. For the Governing Body to be found to be acting outside of the law of the land, it’s disheartening to say the least

;)