Think you've answered your own question ;)
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
That’s also a very good point. It’s much harder giving a reliable legal view if you aren’t in full view of the facts.Come on, he's analyses what he see's. The problem is it's hard to analyse things you can't see. There was very very little information coming out other than we've won some bits for one journo and also a rule was dropped at a PL meeting. That's it, that's all we had to work with, so it made it virtually impossible to say anything about the judgement
The only way to avoid it in those circumstances would be not give any view at all, which would have made this and the other thread far less absorbing.
MMA
Well-Known Member
Can't wait for Lego heads next interview.
I wonder if any journalist will ask him about interest free loans and cheating..
You know like they've done to pep for years.
@arsenaldarkarts
I wonder if any journalist will ask him about interest free loans and cheating..
You know like they've done to pep for years.
@arsenaldarkarts
Brendan110_0
Well-Known Member
Part 2 to come next, compensation for lost revenue, wonder what deals the PL scuppered?
Blue Llama
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 May 2009
- Messages
- 5,414
They should apply that fact checking/verifying department to the sports section.The BBC have signalled in various ways recently that they have taken a very anti-City stance, so I am not really surprised.
But it is still shocking when considered against their mandate as a supposed guardian of public trust.
OntarioBlue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jun 2016
- Messages
- 12,965
Why are they disappointed ? I read the Premier League’s statement and clearly they won. I assumed they’d all be popping champagne corks - paid for with interest free borrowed money no doubt.
flb
Well-Known Member
And probably why that slaphead CEO at Arsenal pissed off up the steps of the corporate section when Stones slammed in the equaliserI think it’s obvious the club tipped off some of the media when the ruling was released in Sept. The prem wanted time to get their ducks in a row, and we didn’t just sit and wait. No way Samuels, and others in media have drafted that article so quickly following the official publication.
He chose to quote tariq panja while also saying on talksport that he thought we wouldnt win, clearly an intelligent and well informed man but the sources you use and the company you keep goes along way.Come on, he's analyses what he see's. The problem is it's hard to analyse things you can't see. There was very very little information coming out other than we've won some bits for one journo and also a rule was dropped at a PL meeting. That's it, that's all we had to work with, so it made it virtually impossible to say anything about the judgement
He’s got a point. For the Governing Body to be found to be acting outside of the law of the land, it’s disheartening to say the leastPut this on the RedCaf meltdown...but hey ho.
Look at the state of this ****...
View attachment 134251
;)
SecondedMotion to hence forth refer to Arsenal Football Club as “Smacked Arse FC”.