City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

Think it’s fair to say Stefan isn’t the oracle some think him to be.

A very good poster and I’m not knocking him at all but he isn’t the all seeing eye.
No I wasn’t knocking him either mate. Hes clearly very knowledgable. If what I remember is right, he just didn’t see how we could win this for whatever reason.
 
Also damming in this report is the page 7th October Newcastle taken over then an owner from another club emailed the PL on behalf of him and 10 other clubs asking for a meeting within 5 days or sooner to amend related party transactions. Tomlie also posted this on X which is bound to be true based on the stictch Newcastle up email:

Emails were demanded from the Premier League. They painted a disgraceful picture which bodes well for our 115 case.
 
A hierarchy
Spread out on the nightstand
The spirit of team
Salvation is another chance
A sore loser
Yelling with my mouth shut
A cracking portrait
The fondling of trophies
The null of losing
Can you afford that luxury?
A sore winner
But I'll just keep my mouth shut
It shouldn't bother me
It shouldn't bother me
It shouldn't bother me
It shouldn't but it does
The small victories
The cankers and medallions
The lips on my face
They keep me thinking, that someday
I might beat you
But I'll just keep my mouth shut
It shouldn't bother me (no)
It shouldn't bother me (no, no)
It shouldn't bother me
It shouldn't but it does
It shouldn't bother me (no, no)
It shouldn't bother me
It shouldn't bother me
It shouldn't bother me
If I speak at one constant volume
At one constant pitch
At one constant rhythm right into your ear, you still won't hear
You still won't hear
You still won't hear
You still won't hear
You still won't hear
You still won't hear
You still won't hear
You still won't hear
You still won't hear
You still won't hear
You still won't hear


Absolute tune from the most uncommercial follow up to a hugely commercial album ever.
 
?? I thought part of the 115 were for rules that weren't even in place
Where I understand City might have the biggest issues are some allegations around City execs misrepresenting owner funding as sponsorship income. Anyway I'm far from an expert on this and it's only based on some things I've heard which are just as likely to be bollocks as not so please don't take this as my personal opinion, only a response to what I've heard are possibly the toughest of the 115 charges for City to overcome.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.