City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

[gordondaviesmoustache]

Go to bournemouth and spend 10 minutes there and ull have plenty

It’s really gone downhill in the last decade or so, Shocked at the number of homeless there last time I went. You expect it from many seaside towns, I get that, but Bournemouth is not one where I’d expect to see such sights in such quantity.

 

[Don Karleone]

The Premier League has been retrospectively applying rules in the form of City's sanctions for 18 months now.

Why shouldn't they do the same against Arsenal?

They should, but they probably won't.

 

[skillman]

New banner for the next home game...

'Unlawful. Unfair. Unreasonable. The Premier League... YOU know what you are.'

Please!

 

[cleavers]

The rag owners owe money to the banks, that’s their debt.

Yes, but its semantics really, the banks would want their money back, and it would be the owners who'd have to find it, but OK they currently owe £0.

 

[freshie]

Well done Norris!

 

[blue moony]

Dear god. Read the fucking CAS verdict.

There is no time barring.
The ‘time barred’ stuff couldn’t be adjudicated on by CAS, but they said they’d be on city’s side even if it wasn’t. That’s doubly damning - going out of their way to make a point about ‘time barring’ being irrelevant in a ruling they didn’t need to comment on.

And as per your earlier comment about ‘disguised owner investment’ - read the fucking CAS ruling. ‘No evidence’ was CAS verdict, not once, not twice but iirc 11 times.

IIRC I’ve already (months ago) called you out and said ‘read the CAS verdict’. You seem incapable of doing the basics of reading facts, and just spout hopes and opinions.

You are a wum

I will stick up for him here

He isnt a WUM

Just a typical headed paper no nothing patronising tarquin full of self importance and bollox

 

[mancboy]

It’s really gone downhill in the last decade or so, Shocked at the number of homeless there last time I went. You expect it from many seaside towns, I get that, but Bournemouth is not one where I’d expect to see such sights in such quantity.

Its a none sustainable economy but the housing market and local businesses have not caught up with reality yet

 

[Brewster's millions]

So Liverpool under Klopp, then?

Come on now, they’ve shared the last seven PL titles with us.

 

[SalfordCityBlue]

As someone who is just catching up..

Am I correct to summarise - that the APT rules need to be voted back through (with a majority) to be legally implemented, but in doing so they have to include share holder loans?

If so the 9 clubs with shareholders loans will likely be reassessed? So basically this won't be voted back in, unless there is an agreement that prior loans are excluded?

I think there could be a carve up. City don't necessarily want zero regulation in this area, but they want it to be fair and non-discriminatory (against us). To be honest, I'm not even sure they'd care it was unlawful - as long as it doesn't get challenged they could pass something that all the clubs are happy with - the PL messed up here by picking a fight with the one club that had a) the balls and b) the money to take it all the way.

 

[mancboy]

Haha, the idea of reading something that long, full of legal fuckwittery, is enough to make go to sleep.

Behave this thread probably makes it look like the beano