City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

[SkyBlueFlux]

Fucking clueless cretin.
City won on the two most important points. The rest are effing trivial.

"I told you I wasn't a thief!" Says man found guilty of only one out of five counts of robbery.

 

[M Gaudino]

What do u expect ?the bbc still can bring them selves to say Hamas is a terror organisation!

not a surprise is it…..

 

[Ducado]

Any new rules they bring in will have to be legally watertight, do clubs have vote in new rules? If so is it a simple majority?

Going to be tricky for some clubs, but if you make rules to benefit yourself and get called out on it,

 

[mancboy]

"The Premier League, its rulebook and executives are facing a firing squad but are now asking to inspect the guns to ensure they fit professional standards. What a shower they are."
Martin Samuel today

https://archive.ph/LFW0m

They will be fine the firing squad will be composed of darwin nunez, joshua zirkzee, anthony and timo werner

 

[BlueAnorak]

Will Arsenal and Brighton and Everton vote for revised rules that hit them the hardest?
And the answer is...

 

[middle-englandblue]

I think upon a little reflection the extent of City’s victory depends on the club’s objectives. If it was to destroy APT (which I highly doubt) then it’s correct to say it’s somewhat limited, although still material. If it was to recalibrate the rules (which I expect it was) then the success would have to be, at the very least, characterised as highly successful.

However, what cannot be open to debate is the extent of the PL’s defeat. A de facto public authority having a finding that its rules were unlawful, as was the way they were applied, is huge. As are the findings of procedural irregularity and unfairness.

To fail to understand this is to fail to appreciate the function of an authority such as this, the laws of natural justice and the burden and standard of proof required to establish such findings.

This following from the Leicester shambles further underlines this organisation is not even close to being fit to oversee a multi-billion pound industry that has attained huge strategic and commercial importance to the UK.

That should be the story, but instead all we have is mental gymnastics from the media about how neither side won - when one of them manifestly lost.

Deserves a double like

 

[i kne albert davy]

Will Arsenal and Brighton and Everton vote for revised rules that hit them the hardest?
And the answer is...

Doubtful but neither can the rules stay as they are what with being unlawful.

 

[CatMan]

Is it tho, look i like slbsn he is obviously a very intelligent chap but it seems he hasnt learned to not talk before having all the relevant info, his summations have been a little off recently.

What he is also failing to grasp, is that by converting to equity, they must produce more shares, that then devalue their existing shares! If converting to equity was the best way to do it then they wouldn't do loans in the first instance. Also loans are none commital, equity is effectively purchasing, and who the hell would want to right off millions of pounds of their money by taking a bigger % of a sinking ship?

 

[Rory Bluelow]

We’re all wrong. According to the CAF we only won 2 sponsorship complaints, and lost everything else.

Haha. That’ll be all the KCs at Red Cafe Chambers

 

[hello]

Now we have established that West Ham are as bad as the rest can we finally get rid of @BlueHammer85 for pretending to be on our side all these years?

Never trusted him tbh.. :-)

He's a fucking **** with his constant defence of var, Reckon he's knocking of dirty Karen so wouldn't be missed.