halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,072
Seems to me there is a good chance that analysis won't be holding up too well in a couple of weeks. We will see, I suppose.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
Seems to me there is a good chance that analysis won't be holding up too well in a couple of weeks. We will see, I suppose.
Don't know why we need any rules go back to when they wasn't any! Why because clubs who want to win get in Europe will still have to abide by UEFA rules where they use fair value for sponsor they have restrictions on spending to!I am afraid this football regulator will be a big scam, I cannot see any UK government Labour or Tory put together a great regulatory body to regulate football. If anything our rivals be in the ear of the person in charge just as they are with Masters. Starmer already getting sweet gifts from Arsenal due to this.
David Kloppesh
Well-Known Member
The serpent is acting like nothing happened and City needs to squash it.
Seems to me there is a good chance that analysis won't be holding up too well in a couple of weeks. We will see, I suppose.
Based on what? The analysis was from leading sports law silks and partners. What do you know that they don't?
Churchlawtonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Dec 2013
- Messages
- 14,828
The same article that states the rules are easily fixable ie tows the PL line? Do you believe they rules are easily fixable and if so why?This is from The Lawyer. It's a legal publication. You'd be hard pressed to claim bias or misunderstanding from these. They pretty much echo what Stefan has been saying since the start.
The same article that states the rules are easily fixable ie tows the PL line? Do you believe they rules are easily fixable and if so why?
I believe that THEY understand it better than us, yes
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,562
Interesting. More going on than we knew about. Who'd a thunk it?
Archive version: https://archive.ph/vL9FV
Unusual for Ziegler that he isn’t creating a narrative which way it will go, just reporting on facts that there is more & it will be explosive.
I can’t imagine or hope City wouldn’t throw dynamite like the Cliff letter if they didn’t feel it was backed with facts.
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,562
I believe that THEY understand it better than us, yes
Better than Simon Cliff being advised by Lord Pannick.
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,562
This is from The Lawyer. It's a legal publication. You'd be hard pressed to claim bias or misunderstanding from these. They pretty much echo what Stefan has been saying since the start.
It’s exactly what Stefan said. It would be funny if written on the basis of watching talksport ;)
halfcenturyup
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 12,072
Based on what? The analysis was from leading sports law silks and partners. What do you know that they don't?
I know the situation is moving quickly and it very likely hasn't been finished with the 175 page report they have seen.
But yes, I am sure it's a very good analysis of what they know at the moment.
Could be wrong, of course and I will admit that (if anyone is interested) in a couple of weeks if I am. No worries.