Think City promote the witness statement acceptance from the APT panel in the expectation the 115 panel should mirror.I completely agree.
As a much more 'in the know' gentleman once said - clear & obvious.
Think City promote the witness statement acceptance from the APT panel in the expectation the 115 panel should mirror.I completely agree.
As a much more 'in the know' gentleman once said - clear & obvious.
I think that's what city were aiming for but the IC only ruled on the APT side of thingsSince their inception?
Potential grounds for appeal if we were to lose?I think that's what city were aiming for but the IC only ruled on the APT side of things
So, you think the situation can be easily remedied by a few discreet changes?Maybe, clubs voted to leave them out in the first instance, don't see anything happened retrospectively tbh. Rules will be amended, process updated and everyone moves on.
discreet no, but they have the majority of the rules written. I don't think a major re-write from scratch again will be needed, just adjustments needed. Timeframe, right to challenge/reply etc.So, you think the situation can be easily remedied by a few discreet changes?
They normally have a LAG meeting first, so say start at 11 and finish in time for a nice lunch. Expect some leaks around now ......What time is this meeting ?