Right. Worth remembering that neither the AbuDhabi gov nor the sovereign wealth fund have ever put a penny into City or CFG.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)
- Thread starter denislawsbackheel
- Start date
Our majority owner (singular) is from Abu Dhabi, not ‘our owners’. Silver Lake (USA) also own a significant stake and CMC (China) retain a minor stake.Look don’t insult me. Are our owners from Abu Dhabi ? Yes so what the issue ? Is there rightly or wrongly an issue or alleged however miss guided issues around our funding ? Yes is there the same issue rightly or wrongly alleged or otherwise around say Liverpool etc no. So is it racist to point this out no. (He might still be a racist or pointing it out because he is a racist ) Your going to look daft they will ignore you and your minimizing actual racism.
Question how many clubs and where they get their money from should be mention ? For it to be inclusive enough for you all 92 ?
deano ou812
Well-Known Member
Fucking absolutely grinds my gears when anybody mentions City and our Owners in Abu Dhabi as you have posted it’s one person Shiek Mansour,with other Owners ( a stake ) from USA and China…Who are these other owners from Abu Dhabi..Our majority owner (singular) is from Abu Dhabi, not ‘our owners’. Silver Lake (USA) also own a significant stake and CMC (China) retain a minor stake.
Fucking absolutely grinds my gears when anybody mentions City and our Owners in Abu Dhabi as you have posted it’s one person Shiek Mansour,with other Owners ( a stake ) from USA and China…Who are these other owners from Abu Dhabi..
We don't have China anymore it's 77% Sheik and 23% Silverlake
I think there’s a fraction of the Chinese holding left < 1%We don't have China anymore it's 77% Sheik and 23% Silverlake
How about actually dealing with my points rather getting all aggressiveI've done my best to explain how singling out City for unfavourable treatment on the grounds of our owner's nationality is ugly and illegal racism. If you still don't understand the law or think it's just not a very serious breach and trivialises "proper racism" perhaps others can help you understand what's going on better.
johnny crossan
Well-Known Member
I engaged with this poster in good faith but alas a distinct swampy odour is in evidence.How about actually dealing with my points rather getting all aggressive
flb
Well-Known Member
Almost Scruffy Jim levels with silverlake , do they have a leaking roof and fuck Christmas parties off aswell ?We don't have China anymore it's 77% Sheik and 23% Silverlake
So what you’re saying is , we are part owned by Scruffylake ?
cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,563
Look don’t insult me. Are our owners from Abu Dhabi ? Yes so what the issue ? Is there rightly or wrongly an issue or alleged however miss guided issues around our funding ? Yes is there the same issue rightly or wrongly alleged or otherwise around say Liverpool etc no. So is it racist to point this out no. (He might still be a racist or pointing it out because he is a racist ) Your going to look daft they will ignore you and your minimizing actual racism.
Question how many clubs and where they get their money from should be mention ? For it to be inclusive enough for you all 92 ?
In the Queens lifetime horses she owned won over 1600 races with a lot of these horses gifted to her. If you are correct you should be able to find articles describing them as state owned.
dickie davies
Well-Known Member
Surely they have indirectly through Etihad!Right. Worth remembering that neither the AbuDhabi gov nor the sovereign wealth fund have ever put a penny into City or CFG.