City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

I wonder where American owned United, stand on this or American owned Liverpool or even Greek owned Nottingham Forrest?
Rags are owned by American trailer park operators and Scruffy Jim who's fortune is doing down faster than old trafford.

 
Rags are owned by American trailer park operators and Scruffy Jim who's fortune is doing down faster than old trafford.

Sorry I didn't mention the part French owner. I was only talking about majority shareholders. ;-)

Funny though.
 
Rags are owned by American trailer park operators and Scruffy Jim who's fortune is doing down faster than old trafford.

The rags are U.S. OWNED, let’s be as accurate as the Torygraph.
 
The rags are U.S. OWNED, let’s be as accurate as the Torygraph.
Not sure who or what they are owned by.

I find it strange that a billionaire buys a minority shareholding and then basically comes in and runs the show and has the audacity to ask the Nation to fund their new stadium.
 
I don’t know if this Villa asking for postponement now is supporting us or helping the Premier League … by basically giving them a way out of this!?!

Let PL go ahead, let them lose the vote on Friday, or better still the Tribunal comes in and announce the APT laws as illegal as City’s legal position has been and that plays out better for us than a third club (Villa) asking for a postponement and kind of letting PL off the hook and just pushes the whole thing further down the line (giving the cartel more time to think something else up)!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.