cheekybids
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 18 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 10,877
16-4 is a right hammering.
Its not just the cartel clubs that hate us, its the vast majority
Announced as…..
Good honest white American folk 16
Dishonest darkies 4
16-4 is a right hammering.
Its not just the cartel clubs that hate us, its the vast majority
We know they voted as it was 16-4The Red Shirt Cartel clubs, and Spurs, Brighton, Chelsea, and West Ham (7) were never going to vote with City. Everton (1) weren’t going to vote with City because of their loans from the owner to the club. Think there was another club with the same issue. City, Villa, Newcastle and Forest voted against (4) It will be interesting to see how the other 8 clubs voted, against or abstained.
We were always struggling to get 7 to stop this, disappointed with non US owned Leicester & Wolves but no real surprise Chavs & Everton voted with their buddies.Not if the 16 have got it wrong. Then it just proves the vast majority are run by idiots. But we knew that already.
The real battle is still coming, I think.
They call me Mr TibbsAnnounced as…..
Good honest white American folk 16
Dishonest darkies 4
Up to recently the PL have simply not needed a plan B being able to buy off support for their illegal rules. Things are far more difficult now but they feel they can react how they have always done.You might be right. But who is it that ultimately looks bad. The organisation that keeps acting illegally, or the member who challenges that illegality and keeps winning. Even the cartel know the truth of the situation. And all the time the independent regulator lobby looks on.
My personal view is that the PL are playing for time, hoping we are found guilty of enough charges to kick us out, hence problem solved. If the commission is genuinely independent that simply won’t happen, but the PL don’t appear to have a plan B.