I prefer a stunning c…..It's a cunning stunt.
Ah, never mind :)
I prefer a stunning c…..It's a cunning stunt.
Don't think we'll go back to court on this as such - I think whatever the tribunal's final deliberations are will have to be accepted by either side. If the rules are still unlawful then the PL have to go back to the drawing board, if these amendments are deemed sufficient then that's that. City will presumably be reasonably content with the relative successes we've had so far (i.e. effectively scrapping the Feb 24 changes, getting shareholder loans taken into account etc).Oh well, back to court we go.
Inspired witticism ha ha.BREAKING NEWS.....
Sixteen English Premier League Clubs have just voted, for the second time, to adopt rules that have been found to be UNLAWFUL by an Independent Commission.
The vote was taken before the said clubs had read the ICs post hearing report which is due to be published shortly.
Khaldoon al Mubarak Chairman of Manchester City has been taken to a medical clinic with splitting sides.
No further medical updates will be made and his family and friends have requested privacy whilst he composes himself.
As others have said where was all this bollocks when the rags and scousers were dominating english football
This is the latest pile of shite from Sam Wallace. I'm hoping Sheikh Mansour decides he'd rather just shut the Telegraph down and write off his investment instead of selling it to the highest bidder.
Loading…
archive.is
Well up to now they have ignored UK legality. I wonder if they will try to take out or water down the need to obey UK law?Exactly. It’s clear City think they’re potentially still illegal (pending the official ruling) and the clubs that have voted this thru are looking after their self interests first and foremost!!
Unfortunately for the PL, they cant just behave how they want outside the laws of the land!! High stakes now!!
The 'coincidence' is usNo coincidence they’ve won two league titles between them since FFP was introduced. You would think they’d want it fucking off.
Do we know when the final deliberation will be available?Don't think we'll go back to court on this as such - I think whatever the tribunal's final deliberations are will have to be accepted by either side. If the rules are still unlawful then the PL have to go back to the drawing board, if these amendments are deemed sufficient then that's that. City will presumably be reasonably content with the relative successes we've had so far (i.e. effectively scrapping the Feb 24 changes, getting shareholder loans taken into account etc).
Frustratingly, no. Should be fairly soon though I imagine.Do we know when the final deliberation will be available?