ultimateharold
Well-Known Member
Taken down, hope the bottom feeding scum are now looking over their shoulders. Outrageous piece.
Only the tweet....they've kept the piece up on the site.
Taken down, hope the bottom feeding scum are now looking over their shoulders. Outrageous piece.
Absolute scum. I imagine they've had grief, so have taken the tweet down, but are actively earning money from it still being available on their website? I despair about the future if this is what it holds, I really do.Only the tweet....they've kept the piece up on the site.
What was it?Taken down, hope the bottom feeding scum are now looking over their shoulders. Outrageous piece.
I’ve no idea also as I don’t search the internet looking for anti City stuff.What was it?
Right, but nobody seems to have any idea if the voting thing is a separate thing, or just a line thats’s part of pages of evidence that’s part of the ATP case and the ‘tyranny of the majority’ a soundbite taken out of context.
The voting thing just seems odd to me as what would we want it replaced with?
Nat league south, just to piss the fans off further regarding match day travel....or national league north (apparantly).
Was it really that positive. Thought he was more reserved than earlier appearances and didnt seem to think we’d win this new/upcoming APR Arbitration Panel. Plus that we had made Pannicks job more difficult by distracting him/the rest of the legal team from the 115 case. And this Tyranny statement doesnt sit right, even if its not a key part of the submission, dont see us winning on that one at all.
Maybe ill listen again tomorrow, as getting late but feel a little less positive than i did a week ago. Probably not helped by the frankly ludicrous press reaction….