City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

[blue b4 the moon]

Ask him to explain how this bribery would work.

How would the money get from us to the PL?

And how much would it be?

But why wouldn't we pay them off before anything came out?

They really don't think anything through.

 

[deano ou812]

Nothing leaking out about this?

I thought at least one of the pricks from the media might have thrown another made up headline about it out there but nothing!

I'm thinking along the lines of no news is good news or maybe they are still reaching their verdict.

It's very quiet out there though.

I’d be thinking maybe another week before we might get some snippets/leaks of what’s going on that’s just my opinion..

 

[jrb]

Has there been a 115 scenario that the Cult on RAWK haven’t come up with yet?

 

[JASR]

Has there been a 115 scenario that the Cult on RAWK haven’t come up with yet?

Yes, ‘I think it’s our fault’

 

[TheGhost]

Just because it is a bit quiet - here is an example of (another) alternative narrative from the redscouse to explain why we will be successful in our action against the PL and cleared of the 115

They are developing the news of 2nd tier players moving between clubs. Fucking weirdos !!

Quote from: WillG.LFC on Yesterday at 09:07:02 pm


Been thinking the same for a while. They'll spend what they have to in order to buy votes at any upcoming PL meetings, whether it's transfers or lucrative business deals with club owners, sponsorships from their very affluent airlines etc.

Scumbags.

Let’s be honest there’s no other explanation for why we dropped £55m on Matheus Nunes. Also we saved Wolves from failing FFP. Khaldoon must have their backing in his back pocket for a future vote.

 

[StillBluessinceHydeRoad]

Has there been a 115 scenario that the Cult on RAWK haven’t come up with yet?

Yes. City haven't done anything wrong. That one's just too ridiculous for RAWK.

 

[StillBluessinceHydeRoad]

Could it possibly just be that the IC is considering the evidence and discussing its verdict?

 

[Centurions]

Ask him to explain how this bribery would work.

How would the money get from us to the PL?

And how much would it be?

Given the PL comprises all current 20 clubs is he implying that the rags have accepted a bribe (which would explain Scruffy Jims about face I suppose), and does he believe that they should be investigated and punished for it. Perhaps they could be relegated along with the other 19 clubs?

 

[spinney]

Let’s be honest there’s no other explanation for why we dropped £55m on Matheus Nunes. Also we saved Wolves from failing FFP. Khaldoon must have their backing in his back pocket for a future vote.

That's the sort of thing sales was doing to climb the FA ladder

We never did end up with anyone any good from it though

 

[Sheik Battle and Goal]

I was talking to a rag at a do I attended on Saturday night. I didn't know him as he was a friend of a friend

He said he thinks City will be found innocent as they'll never prove the accusations, that it's a joke the PL are pursuing it and in his opinion all City have done is spent their own money to make us winners and to change the whole of East Manchester for the better and it's scandalous that the PL think anything is wrong with that

I nearly had to go and wash out my ears as I thought I must have mis-heard him

I think he summed it up pretty much to a tee.