City launch legal action against the Premier League | City win APT case (pg901)

[yeah whatever !!]

Kaveh Knowsodall. Wrong again.

Kaveh Dweller.

 

[tolmie's hairdoo]

Considerable expense! Christ the sheik loses more down the back of his sofa.

Even that is a snide attempt at a smear.

 

[MCFC1993]

Stop. Quoting. Tariq. Fucking. Panja.

Can we please only share information that is credible and not the diseased thoughts of a Twitter journeyman.

The man who bleated on about 'Sportswashing' for years, managed to secure a 1 hour interview with Mbappe for the New York Times whilst PSG were at peak popularity and didn't ask a single question about Qatar.

Numerous cartel club fans berated him as to why he didn't ask anything on Qatar and his excuse was 'I ran out of time'.

Tells you all you need to know about Tariq. Fucking. Panja!

 

[Ric]

Weren’t we ok with the original APT rules, it was the later amendments that we objected to

Yes, I believe so.

 

[Colin Bells Boots]

Kaveh should have quit and gone mute after the van de beek fiasco, the fact that he still speaks on sky shows how shameless he is

And how pathetic sky are for employing the fucking knownowt.

 

[salfordbluetrue]

A new rule book was published after the February vote.

Edit: just to be clear, that is a second rule book for 23/24 with the new APT rules in it.

The 24/25 rule book had the same APT rules as the second 23/24 rule book.

Thank you, you do not know know just how much this has been rattling around in my head.
So this news may be an indication that the PL want to dump, but the proof of the pudding is still the change of the rule book.
The first thing i would do in this situation is stop all usage and stop miss use that could come back and bite me ie access to the data base, until all outcomes have been reached.

 

[kaz7]

I have got fuck all idea what this case is about , no need to explain it, but anything that fucks over the pl i will celebrate wholeheartedly , lol

 

[halfcenturyup]

I may have phrased that a bit wrong.

I don't really care where its coming from but i still agree the idea on having some rules from Etihad or similar sponsoring the left sock of every player for a billion quid a season etc. There's should be a middle ground in there that doesn't fuck everything up imo.

I also get the 'well fuck em' side as well, coz why not.

There are other rules in place to prevent clubs entering into crazy contracts on anything other than arm's length. These APT rules are completely unnecessary in reality, especially as there has never been a case of sponsorship that has been so out of line with fmv that it raised eyebrows (the nearest possibly being the original Etihad contract but that later turned out to be good value).

 

[Kippaxpete]

View attachment 133020View attachment 133021

off topic I know but any excuse to post this classic.

 

[DenisLawBackHeel74]

Either way, if the outcome has been relayed to us and the Premier League then I really would have expected some sort of update at today's meeting from Masters

So just so we’re clear you want…to...masters debate?



* runs away sniggering