It’s the best they can come up after having 2 weeks to do so! Hahaha.Doesn't it mean that City won if some clauses related to ATP need to be amended or removed? I don't understand the Premier League's statement.
They’re trying to claim a victory by suggesting the panel agreed that there is a need for rulesDoesn't it mean that City won if some clauses related to ATP need to be amended or removed? I don't understand the Premier League's statement.
Take that you dirty bastards Leave my club aloneI know this doesn't directly relate to 115, but it does highlight that not only are the PL utterly incompetent and unlawful, but they are clearly targeting City to stop our progress and superiority.
Anyone who is objectively looking at this must surely wonder how can those 115 charges stack up when they have clearly been found to be targeting and cheating to bring City down.
Actually Lawton’s pieceHe's the only one I'd trust to tell the actual truth, he always has.
Don'tI’m going to buy a new Dyson as a thank you :)
Doesn't it mean that City won if some clauses related to ATP need to be amended or removed? I don't understand the Premier League's statement.